Emotion Profiling in LLM-Based Literary Translation: Systematic Shifts Across MT and Post-Editing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates whether LLM translations exhibit identifiable emotional profiles and how post-editing reshapes them toward human-like norms. We compare LLM translations of Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake with their post-edited versions and a human translation, using a large-scale corpus of contemporary Italian science-fiction as a baseline. We examine emotion through lexicon-based and multilingual modeling, conducting a fine-grained analysis of emotional variation across systems. We find that MT systems introduce model-specific and statistically significant emotional fingerprints across translations, leading to a limited preservation of an author's voice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 23 references.
References · 10
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,290
- 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
- 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
- 2021Machine Translationese: Effects of Algorithmic Bias on Linguistic Complexity in Machine Translationcited by 70
- 2019Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translationcited by 45
- 2023Do GPTs Produce Less Literal Translations?cited by 30
- 2019Post-editese: an Exacerbated Translationesecited by 29
- 2024How Good Are LLMs for Literary Translation, Really? Literary Translation Evaluation with Humans and LLMscited by 23
- 2023Evaluating Emotion Arcs Across Languages: Bridging the Global Divide in Sentiment Analysiscited by 16
- 2025Extending CREAMT: Leveraging Large Language Models for Literary Translation Post-Editingcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.