Integrating Local and Global Entropy for Uncertainty Quantification in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models hallucinate confidently, making uncertainty quantification (UQ) essential for reliable deployment. Existing methods rely predominantly on token-level signals, leaving the geometric structure of intermediate hidden states underused. In this paper, we take the geometric complexity of hidden-state matrices as a measure of the global uncertainty of LLMs, while treating token-level uncertainty estimation as a local metric. We show that hidden-state geometric entropy (global uncertainty) and token-level entropy (local uncertainty) are statistically near-orthogonal, capturing distinct failure regimes for reliability prediction. In particular, global geometry recovers the confident-but-wrong failure mode that local signals systematically miss. Building on this, we propose Global-Local Uncertainty (GLU), an unsupervised, single-pass score that fuses the two signals via a multiplicative gate. Across three model families and six benchmarks, GLU matches or outperforms all unsupervised baselines while requiring only a single forward pass and remaining length-normalized and architecture-agnostic.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
25 of 32 references.
References · 25
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,686
- 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 787
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 728
- 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
- 2025LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversationcited by 400
- 2025Layer by Layer: Uncovering Hidden Representations in Language Modelscited by 293
- 2024LLMs Know More Than They Show: On the Intrinsic Representation of LLM Hallucinationscited by 230
13 more
- 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 156
- 2024To Believe or Not to Believe Your LLMcited by 120
- 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 96
- 2025Fanar: An Arabic-Centric Multimodal Generative AI Platformcited by 67
- 2024Mitigating LLM Hallucinations via Conformal Abstentioncited by 56
- 2023LongForm: Effective Instruction Tuning with Reverse Instructionscited by 47
- 2024Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 47
- 2025Estimating LLM Uncertainty with Evidencecited by 26
- 2024SLED: Self Logits Evolution Decoding for Improving Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2025Efficient Hallucination Detection for LLMs Using Uncertainty-Aware Attention Headscited by 14
- 2025AA-Omniscience: Evaluating Cross-Domain Knowledge Reliability in Large Language Modelscited by 12
- 2025Can LLMs Detect Their Confabulations? Estimating Reliability in Uncertainty-Aware Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024Beyond the Black Box: A Statistical Model for LLM Reasoning and Inferencecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.