FASE: Fast Adaptive Semantic Entropy for Code Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent code generation offers a promising paradigm for autonomous software development by simulating the human software engineering lifecycle. However, system reliability remains hindered by LLM hallucinations and error propagation across interacting agents. While semantic entropy provides a principled way to quantify uncertainty without ground-truth answers, current methods often rely on costly LLM-driven equivalence checks. In this work, we introduce Fast Adaptive Semantic Entropy (FASE), a novel metric that approximates functional correctness based on the minimum spanning tree of structural and semantic dissimilarity graphs. Evaluations on HumanEval and BigCodeBench demonstrate that FASE outperforms state-of-the-art semantic entropy by LLM entailment, achieving a 25% average improvement in Spearman correlation and a 19% increase in ROCAUC score against Pass@1 from ground-truth test cases when using the Qwen3-Embedding-8B model. Furthermore, by eliminating costly LLM-driven equivalence evaluation, FASE incurs negligible computational overhead, requiring only approximately 0.3% of the runtime cost of traditional semantic entropy approaches. These results position FASE as a practical, cost-effective solution for optimizing uncertainty quantification in real-world multi-agent workflows.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
39 of 51 references.
References · 39
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
- 2020MiniLM: Deep Self-Attention Distillation for Task-Agnostic Compression of Pre-Trained Transformerscited by 1,414
- 2025Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Modelscited by 1,175
- 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
- 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
- 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
- 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 695
27 more
- 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
- 2023Multi-Agent Collaboration: Harnessing the Power of Intelligent LLM Agentscited by 329
- 2023CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-Xcited by 294
- 2023A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaborationcited by 281
- 2023Self-collaboration Code Generation via ChatGPTcited by 255
- 2024mGTE: Generalized Long-Context Text Representation and Reranking Models for Multilingual Text Retrievalcited by 233
- 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 190
- 2024Large Language Model-Based Agents for Software Engineering: A Surveycited by 173
- 2025MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agentscited by 169
- 2024LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Aheadcited by 155
- 2025From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 146
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 145
- 2024Beyond Functional Correctness: Exploring Hallucinations in LLM-Generated Codecited by 106
- 2024LLM Hallucinations in Practical Code Generation: Phenomena, Mechanism, and Mitigationcited by 92
- 2023Refining ChatGPT-Generated Code: Characterizing and Mitigating Code Quality Issuescited by 78
- 2024LLM-Based Test-Driven Interactive Code Generation: User Study and Empirical Evaluationcited by 46
- 2023No Need to Lift a Finger Anymore? Assessing the Quality of Code Generation by ChatGPTcited by 45
- 2025CodeCoR: An LLM-Based Self-Reflective Multi-Agent Framework for Code Generationcited by 33
- 2024Measuring and Reducing LLM Hallucination without Gold-Standard Answerscited by 31
- 2024De-Hallucinator: Mitigating LLM Hallucinations in Code Generation Tasks via Iterative Groundingcited by 14
- 2024What can Large Language Models Capture about Code Functional Equivalence?cited by 13
- 2024The Impact of Prompt Programming on Function-Level Code Generationcited by 13
- 2025AdaCoder: An Adaptive Planning and Multi-Agent Framework for Function-Level Code Generationcited by 8
- 2025Hallucination to Consensus: Multi-Agent LLMs for End-to-End JUnit Test Generationcited by 8
- 2025Mutation-Guided Unit Test Generation with a Large Language Modelcited by 6
- 2025Semantic uncertainty in advanced decoding methods for LLM generationcited by 3
- 2025Measuring LLM Code Generation Stability via Structural Entropycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.