mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hybrid Robustness Verification for Spatio-Temporal Neural Networks

arXiv 2606.09746 ↗First posted 8 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With AI increasingly deployed in safety-critical systems, providing formal robustness guarantees for the underlying models is essential. Existing verification methods either rely on overly conservative approximations or incur prohibitive computational costs. For example, the use of lp-norm perturbations in video settings encodes the belief that the adversary can inject noise in every video frame. In practice, adversarial perturbations exhibit structured spatial and temporal correlations, constrained to lower-dimensional, semantically meaningful subspaces. In this work, we study robustness verification of 3D CNNs processing video and volumetric inputs, targeting applications in action recognition (UCF-101), autonomous driving (Udacity), and medical imaging (MedMNIST) exploiting realistic assumptions on adversarial strength by modelling them as spatio-temporal constraints - where the attacker can modify either a subset of frames or patches within a set of consecutive frames. We demonstrate that modelling realistic constraints enables tighter approximations. We introduce Spatio-Temporal Bound Propagation (STBP), a verification framework that computes an exact closed-form characterization of the first convolutional layer and propagates certified bounds through subsequent layers using scalable approximations. Computing the exact closed form provides the tightest bounds for the first convolutional layer. Thus, we utilise approximation methods in the remainder of the network. To spur further progress in this field, we propose ST-Bench, a verification benchmark for autonomous driving and activity recognition, to systematically evaluate verifiable robustness. Compared to existing verification-based approaches, STBP provides stronger robustness guarantees with significantly improved scalability, achieving 1.7x higher certified robust accuracy under identical perturbation budgets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.

Builds on

41 of 61 references.

References · 41

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 744
  4. 2021MedMNIST v2 -- A large-scale lightweight benchmark for 2D and 3D biomedical image classificationcited by 690
  5. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 567
  6. 2018Lipschitz regularity of deep neural networks: analysis and efficient estimationcited by 415
  7. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 328
  8. 2025YOLOv12: Attention-Centric Real-Time Object Detectorscited by 305
  9. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 293
  10. 2020Fast and Furious: Real Time End-to-End 3D Detection, Tracking and Motion Forecasting with a Single Convolutional Netcited by 228
  11. 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 195
  12. 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 185
29 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 183
  2. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 127
  3. 2018A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networkscited by 125
  4. 2020Certified Defenses for Adversarial Patchescited by 101
  5. 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
  6. 2020Verification of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using ImageStarscited by 75
  7. 2021Skew Orthogonal Convolutionscited by 67
  8. 2022Certified Training: Small Boxes are All You Needcited by 52
  9. 2017Feature-Guided Black-Box Safety Testing of Deep Neural Networkscited by 49
  10. 2023When Deep Learning Meets Polyhedral Theory: A Surveycited by 39
  11. 2018A Game-Based Approximate Verification of Deep Neural Networks with Provable Guaranteescited by 33
  12. 2018Defending Against Universal Perturbations With Shared Adversarial Trainingcited by 25
  13. 2023Expressive Losses for Verified Robustness via Convex Combinationscited by 23
  14. 2023Towards Generalizable Diabetic Retinopathy Grading in Unseen Domainscited by 21
  15. 2022REAP: A Large-Scale Realistic Adversarial Patch Benchmarkcited by 18
  16. 2024Certified Robustness to Data Poisoning in Gradient-Based Trainingcited by 18
  17. 2019Robustness Guarantees for Deep Neural Networks on Videoscited by 14
  18. 2021Infinite Time Horizon Safety of Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 13
  19. 2023Image Quality-aware Diagnosis via Meta-knowledge Co-embeddingcited by 12
  20. 2023Towards Verifying the Geometric Robustness of Large-scale Neural Networkscited by 11
  21. 2021Certification of Iterative Predictions in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 8
  22. 2024Certification for Differentially Private Prediction in Gradient-Based Trainingcited by 7
  23. 2025Abstract Gradient Training: A Unified Certification Framework for Data Poisoning, Unlearning, and Differential Privacycited by 7
  24. 2022Zonotope Domains for Lagrangian Neural Network Verificationcited by 5
  25. 2023Probabilistic Reach-Avoid for Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 5
  26. 2024Relational DNN Verification With Cross Executional Bound Refinementcited by 5
  27. 2026Exact Certification of Data-Poisoning Attacks Using Mixed-Integer Programmingcited by 4
  28. 2024Benchmarking the Robustness of Panoptic Segmentation for Automated Drivingcited by 3
  29. 2020Last-mile Delivery: Optimal Locker Location Under Multinomial Logit Choice Modelcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.