Learning Dynamics Reveal a Hierarchy of Weight-Induced Layerwise Gram Metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study feed-forward ReLU networks with fixed readout and quadratic loss, and rewrite gradient descent as a collective dynamics of activation fields and conjugate fields on the training set. Working to first order in the learning rate inside a fixed activation chamber, we derive explicitly the one-, two- and three-hidden-layer cases, and then give the arbitrary-depth recursion. For one hidden layer the activation dynamics closes directly and the residual update is governed by the product of an input Gram matrix and a co-activation/backpropagation Gram matrix. For two hidden layers a conjugate field is required, but no nontrivial pullback Gram metric has yet appeared. For three hidden layers the first weight-induced pullback Gram metric enters the conjugate-field dynamics. At arbitrary depth, activation variations propagate forward through a recursive response operator (cUℓαβ), while conjugate-field variations propagate backward through an effective transport operator (cMℓαβ). Their contractions reconstruct a layerwise residual kernel [ Kαβ(L)=sumℓ=1LQαβ(ℓ-1)Sαβ(ℓ). ] The resulting description exposes a duality between push-forward and pullback transport across every layer cut, and identifies the first Gram metrics as the lowest nontrivial terms in a broader hierarchy of activation-conditioned transport operators. We deliberately stop at the level of collective fields, conjugate fields, residual kernels and cut-wise transport metrics, leaving the later tensorial geometric formulation outside the scope of this paper.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
3 of 5 references.
References · 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.