A Multi-Agent System for Motor Design Optimization via an FEA-AI Hybrid Approach
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Multimodal and embodied agents
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents a large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent framework for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) design optimization that mitigates limitations of conventional workflows: expertise-dependent problem setup and data preparation, the prohibitive computational cost of finite element analysis (FEA), and the unreliability of AI surrogates in unexplored regions. To this end, we first introduce a Design agent that formulates the optimization problem in natural language, leveraging retrieval-augmented generation to improve answer accuracy on motor design problems from below 50% to 67-80%. Furthermore, a Training agent autonomously repairs improperly defined design spaces by reasoning over solver failure history, raising the success ratio of the geometry sampling from 28% to 84% for AI training. Additionally, to resolve cost and reliability simultaneously, an Optimization agent employs an uncertainty-aware FEA-AI hybrid model: the AI surrogate is the primary evaluator, and FEA is selectively invoked where predictive uncertainty is high. Under the same FEA budget, this hybrid model achieves up to 44% lower iron loss in single-objective and 22.5% higher hypervolume in multi-objective optimization than conventional FEA-only search. Under the same evaluation budget, it reduces computation time by 52-55% while retaining 90-92% of FEA-only hypervolume. Conversely, AI-only search converges to false optima, leaving half its Pareto designs infeasible. Notably, a controller agent adaptively updates the uncertainty threshold that triggers FEA each round, eliminating manual tuning and achieving 5.8% lower single objective iron loss than with a fixed threshold. These results establish domain specialized LLM agents with uncertainty-aware hybrid evaluation as a reliable, scalable paradigm for simulation-driven design automation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal and embodied agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 46 references.
References · 10
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 830
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 380
- 2022On the Pitfalls of Heteroscedastic Uncertainty Estimation with Probabilistic Neural Networkscited by 119
- 2022Topology Optimization via Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 22
- 2023Towards Reliable Uncertainty Quantification via Deep Ensembles in Multi-output Regression Taskcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Large Language Model Agent as a Mechanical Designer
- 2025A Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization (MDO) Agent Driven by Large Language Models
- 2026VFEAgent: A Multimodal Agent Framework for End-to-End Automated Finite Element Analysis
- 2026A Multi-AI-agent Framework Enabling End-to-end Finite Element Analysis for Solid Mechanics Problems
- 2026ALL-FEM: Agentic Large Language models Fine-tuned for Finite Element Methods
- 2025FeaGPT: an End-to-End agentic-AI for Finite Element Analysis
- 2026Closed-loop AI achieves certifiable engineering design
- 2026Multi-Agent Collaboration for Automated Design Exploration on High Performance Computing Systems