mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Amplifying Mirror: Locating and Steering the Partisan Direction inside a Large Language Model

arXiv 2606.08792 ↗First posted 7 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are rapicly replacing search engines as the primary interface between people and information. Unlike search engines, which retrieve existing content, LLMs generate novel text shaped by internal representations learned during training. Here we show that partisan political identity is encoded in the model's activation space, and that this direction directly shapes generation. Using 190,491 tweets from sitting members of the U.S. Congress as labeled training data, we train linear probes on the hidden states of the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct model. We identify a single geometric axis at layer 18 that separates Republican from Democratic text with an AUC of 0.945 and a Cohen's d of 1.94, and use sparse autoencoders to decompose that axis into interpretable partisan features. Causally intervening along this axis, ablating or amplifying the partisan component mid-generation, produces systematic shifts in the model's output. We witness stance reversals, register shifting, and structured fabrications of authority. Our results demonstrate that partisan bias in language models is not a vague emergent property but a learned geometric feature that can be precisely located and steered. Partisan bias is not a bug to be patched, but a structural property of how these models encode information about their users. As LLMs displace search engines as the interface to knowledge, understanding that product design (and its consequences) will be essential for navigating the legal, social, and political transitions from an information ecosystem that is curated to one that is generated.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2026.

Builds on

11 of 19 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,279
  2. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  3. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,009
  4. 2023Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Modelscited by 988
  5. 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 831
  6. 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 824
  7. 2023Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?cited by 759
  8. 2023Finding Neurons in a Haystack: Case Studies with Sparse Probingcited by 328
  9. 2023From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Modelscited by 257
  10. 2024The Political Preferences of LLMscited by 83
  11. 2025Linear Representations of Political Perspective Emerge in Large Language Modelscited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.