mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TLRD: Teaching LLMs to Reason over Tabular Data with Tri-Level Rationale Distillation

arXiv 2606.08295 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Tabular data is a primary medium for storing real-world information, driving many industrial applications of machine learning. Traditional predictors achieve strong predictive performance but do not provide readable, case-specific explanations essential for decision-making. Large Language Models (LLMs) can naturally bridge this gap by generating predictions alongside explanations. However, dataset-specific patterns, such as feature distributions and interactions, make tabular data difficult for LLMs to understand and reason over, while label-only fine-tuning improves performance at the cost of catastrophic forgetting. To address this problem, we propose Tri-Level Rationale Distillation (TLRD), a framework that converts label-only tabular datasets into structured rationale supervision for LLMs. TLRD uses a high-capacity teacher to synthesize a rationale corpus grounded in three complementary levels of evidence: instance-level feature, dataset-level distributional context, and comparison-level retrieved neighbors, then distills the rationale into student LLMs, enabling zero-overhead prediction and grounded explanation from raw features only. Experiments on multiple domain datasets show that TLRD significantly closes the performance gap between LLMs and state-of-the-art tree ensembles while producing grounded and readable explanations, offering a valuable reference for high-stakes decision-making.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 36 references.

References · 8

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  3. 2025Gemma 3 Technical Reportcited by 1,824
  4. 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
  5. 2023UniPredict: Large Language Models are Universal Tabular Classifierscited by 9
  6. 2025TabGemma: Text-Based Tabular ICL via LLM using Continued Pretraining and Retrievalcited by 6
  7. 2025Utilizing Training Data to Improve LLM Reasoning for Tabular Understandingcited by 2
  8. 2026BoostLLM: Boosting-inspired LLM Fine-tuning for Few-shot Tabular Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Distillation of Tabular Foundation Models into Efficient Predictors
  2. 2026ReSS: Learning Reasoning Models for Tabular Data Prediction via Symbolic Scaffold
  3. 2025How well do LLMs reason over tabular data, really?
  4. 2024Augmenting In-Context-Learning in LLMs via Automatic Data Labeling and Refinement
  5. 2025Investigating the Impact of Rationales for LLMs on Natural Language Understanding
  6. 2024RATIONALYST: Mining Implicit Rationales for Process Supervision of Reasoning
  7. 2024Mentor-KD: Making Small Language Models Better Multi-step Reasoners
  8. 2023XplainLLM: A Knowledge-Augmented Dataset for Reliable Grounded Explanations in LLMs