mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Disturbance-Aware Aerial Robotics for Ethical Wildlife Monitoring

arXiv 2606.08249 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2026cs.RO cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable wildlife monitoring is essential for ecology and conservation, yet many existing methods, such as tagging, capture, and close-range observation, can alter the very behaviors they aim to measure. Aerial robots offer a scalable alternative, which has shown promising performance in multiple studies. Nonetheless, existing approaches typically lack behavioral awareness, rely on fixed heuristics, or require real-world training data that are costly, impractical, and ethically difficult to obtain. As a result, there remains no general framework for adaptive drone-based monitoring that can both preserve ecological validity and scale across species, behaviors, and robotic platforms. In this study, we introduce a disturbance-aware reinforcement-learning-based framework for heterogeneous aerial robotic fleets that enables autonomous wildlife tracking while explicitly minimizing behavioral disruption. We couple a zoologically grounded simulation environment with fitted animal movement models derived from real trajectory statistics, and train control policies using a reward formulation that captures the trade-off between observation quality and disturbance risk. Across three species (pigeon, jackal, and spur-winged lapwing) with distinct ecologies and motion patterns and four increasingly strategic behavior models common in nature, the learned policies consistently surpassed currently used rule-based baselines and generalized across monitoring tasks, animal dynamics, and drone types. These results establish disturbance-aware learning as a viable foundation for non-invasive autonomous wildlife observation, opening a path towards scalable, ethically responsible, and scientifically reliable robotic monitoring in ecology and conservation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 94 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  3. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  4. 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
  5. 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
  6. 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
  7. 2019Active Domain Randomizationcited by 161
  8. 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: A Survey of Real-World Successescited by 153
  9. 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  10. 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Surveycited by 81
  11. 2021Robot Learning from Randomized Simulations: A Reviewcited by 56
  12. 2023Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Based on Decomposition: A Taxonomy and Frameworkcited by 28
5 more
  1. 2023Train Hard, Fight Easy: Robust Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  2. 2017TrackerBots: Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Real-Time Localization and Tracking of Multiple Radio-Tagged Animalscited by 2
  3. 2023ConservationBots: Autonomous Aerial Robot for Fast Robust Wildlife Tracking in Complex Terrainscited by 2
  4. 2025Socially aware navigation for mobile robots: a survey on deep reinforcement learning approachescited by 2
  5. 2025COMPASS: Cooperative Multi-Agent Persistent Monitoring using Spatio-Temporal Attention Networkcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.