Disturbance-Aware Aerial Robotics for Ethical Wildlife Monitoring
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Reliable wildlife monitoring is essential for ecology and conservation, yet many existing methods, such as tagging, capture, and close-range observation, can alter the very behaviors they aim to measure. Aerial robots offer a scalable alternative, which has shown promising performance in multiple studies. Nonetheless, existing approaches typically lack behavioral awareness, rely on fixed heuristics, or require real-world training data that are costly, impractical, and ethically difficult to obtain. As a result, there remains no general framework for adaptive drone-based monitoring that can both preserve ecological validity and scale across species, behaviors, and robotic platforms. In this study, we introduce a disturbance-aware reinforcement-learning-based framework for heterogeneous aerial robotic fleets that enables autonomous wildlife tracking while explicitly minimizing behavioral disruption. We couple a zoologically grounded simulation environment with fitted animal movement models derived from real trajectory statistics, and train control policies using a reward formulation that captures the trade-off between observation quality and disturbance risk. Across three species (pigeon, jackal, and spur-winged lapwing) with distinct ecologies and motion patterns and four increasingly strategic behavior models common in nature, the learned policies consistently surpassed currently used rule-based baselines and generalized across monitoring tasks, animal dynamics, and drone types. These results establish disturbance-aware learning as a viable foundation for non-invasive autonomous wildlife observation, opening a path towards scalable, ethically responsible, and scientifically reliable robotic monitoring in ecology and conservation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.
Builds on
17 of 94 references.
References · 17
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
- 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
- 2014A Survey of Multi-Objective Sequential Decision-Makingcited by 229
- 2020Weighted QMIX: Expanding Monotonic Value Function Factorisation for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 197
- 2019Active Domain Randomizationcited by 161
- 2024Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: A Survey of Real-World Successescited by 153
- 2019A Review of Cooperative Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
- 2022Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes in Robotics: A Surveycited by 81
- 2021Robot Learning from Randomized Simulations: A Reviewcited by 56
- 2023Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Based on Decomposition: A Taxonomy and Frameworkcited by 28
5 more
- 2023Train Hard, Fight Easy: Robust Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
- 2017TrackerBots: Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Real-Time Localization and Tracking of Multiple Radio-Tagged Animalscited by 2
- 2023ConservationBots: Autonomous Aerial Robot for Fast Robust Wildlife Tracking in Complex Terrainscited by 2
- 2025Socially aware navigation for mobile robots: a survey on deep reinforcement learning approachescited by 2
- 2025COMPASS: Cooperative Multi-Agent Persistent Monitoring using Spatio-Temporal Attention Networkcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.