mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing AI Interpretability with Localised Architectures

arXiv 2606.07998 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in generative AI, especially powerful Large Language Models (LLMs), raise concerns over the interpretability, safety and sustainability of these large and opaque AI models. The power of such architectures is derived not only from the scalability of deep neural networks (DNNs), but also massively parallel hardware such as GPU clusters. The diffuse nature of DNNs gives them great function-approximation capability when provided with sufficient training data but imposes a cost in interpretability and computational efficiency. Observing that localised machine learning (ML) models tend to be more interpretable and computationally efficient than DNNs on small datasets, we reason by analogy that similar advantages may apply to specific localised hardware ML architectures. We argue that localised architectures with lower bandwidth but higher expressivity per node have the potential to be fundamentally more interpretable than DNNs running on GPU clusters while remaining competitive for smaller datasets. We then survey the suitability of various hardware ML paradigms for implementing such localised architectures and evaluate their per-node expressivity, energy efficiency and practical maturity of the technology required.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 64 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  4. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  5. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  6. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  7. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  8. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  9. 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 966
  10. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  11. 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 618
  12. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 491
14 more
  1. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 422
  2. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
  3. 2022The Alignment Problem from a Deep Learning Perspectivecited by 258
  4. 2023Causal Abstraction: A Theoretical Foundation for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 205
  5. 2017Medical Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 99
  6. 2024RLHF Deciphered: A Critical Analysis of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for LLMscited by 90
  7. 2023Seeing is Believing: Brain-Inspired Modular Training for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 38
  8. 2025The Non-Linear Representation Dilemma: Is Causal Abstraction Enough for Mechanistic Interpretability?cited by 37
  9. 2021Fast TreeSHAP: Accelerating SHAP Value Computation for Treescited by 29
  10. 2019A study on the Interpretability of Neural Retrieval Models using DeepSHAPcited by 19
  11. 2023Fast offset corrected in-memory trainingcited by 11
  12. 2026From Weights to Activations: Is Steering the Next Frontier of Adaptation?cited by 8
  13. 2022Performance and Interpretability Comparisons of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: An Empirical Studycited by 4
  14. 2025Comparison of generalised additive models and neural networks in applications: A systematic reviewcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.