mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agentic multi-fidelity learning of quasiparticle and excitonic properties

arXiv 2606.07836 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.stat-mech cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many-body GW-Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations are essential for accurate simulations of electronic structure and optical properties in modern low-dimensional nanomaterials. However, these methods are computationally demanding and can exhibit localized numerical instabilities or convergence failures that are difficult to detect within high-throughput workflows. We introduce an agent-guided multi-fidelity framework for correcting GW-Bethe-Salpeter excited-state landscapes in strained MoS2-WS2 bilayers. Across stacking registries, strain branches and reciprocal-space samplings, the workflow identifies spike-like excursions, near-zero-gap collapse and cross-fidelity inconsistencies associated with fragile long-wavelength dielectric screening. A structural agent evaluates calculations by assigning confidence weights and selectively using a small number of high-accuracy reference points. Machine learning models then transfer information across related systems and apply Gaussian process corrections to recover improved quasiparticle gaps and exciton binding energies, with calibrated uncertainty estimates. The approach corrects numerically induced artifacts without erasing physical strain dependence and substantially improves agreement with higher-fidelity references relative to a no-agent baseline. These results show that reliable surrogate learning for excited-state materials requires explicit diagnosis of numerical fragility, not direct interpolation of raw first-principles data points. The proposed framework is readily transferable to other optoelectronic nanomaterials characterized by strong quantum confinement, such as quantum dots, nanoribbons, layered two-dimensional semiconductors, and hybrid perovskite nanostructures.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

5 of 44 references.

References · 5

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 734
  3. 2017Causal Structure Learningcited by 84
  4. 2020Machine learning for electronically excited states of moleculescited by 30
  5. 2022Causality-driven Hierarchical Structure Discovery for Reinforcement Learningcited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026QERNEL: a Scalable Large Electron Model
  2. 2026Physics-Aligned Electronic Ground-State Learning Improves Generalization
  3. 2026Domain-Gated Latent Diffusion: Generative Inverse Design of HMX-Class Energetic Materials with First-Principles Validation
  4. 2026LLM-Guided Test-Time Discovery of Quantum-Chemical Approximation Algorithms
  5. 2025Enhancing Materials Discovery with Valence Constrained Design in Generative Modeling
  6. 2026Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States for Molecular Potential Energy Surfaces in Second Quantization
  7. 2026OxiGen: Oxidation-State-Aware Crystal Generation
  8. 2021Interpretable discovery of new semiconductors with machine learning