mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HARP: Efficient Data Selection for Finetuning Large Language Models

arXiv 2606.07690 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Finetuning data selection requires balancing two competing goals: selecting examples that improve the downstream objective, and doing so without repeatedly finetuning models. Train-free selectors are scalable but rely on proxies such as embedding similarity or clustering, which may not match the target objective. Train-based selectors better reflect downstream utility through gradient signals, subset evaluation, or Shapley attribution, but require many costly train-evaluate iterations. We propose Hierarchical Active Region Pruning (HARP), an efficient train-based selector that preserves downstream alignment while reducing selection cost. HARP organizes the training pool into a node-leaf hierarchy, evaluates only representative leaves, and infers unmeasured utilities with empirical Bayes posteriors. It then selects data using two complementary envelopes: HARP-C, which conservatively controls redundancy, and HARP-E, which additively rewards complementary regions. We theoretically show that, under local smoothness and bounded estimation error, HARP controls selection error while reducing train-evaluate cost. Across 3 base models, 3 finetuning datasets, and 4 reasoning benchmarks (36 settings), HARP variants achieve the highest accuracy among ranked methods in 23 settings and obtain 36-setting mean accuracies of 64.2 and 63.5, respectively, compared with 59.3 for the strongest baseline, NICE. HARP-C trains on roughly 9x fewer examples than the budgeted baselines and 75x fewer than full finetuning, combining higher mean accuracy with a smaller mean training-set size than every ranked baseline.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

24 of 41 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  4. 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
  5. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  6. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  7. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  8. 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 781
  9. 2023AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human Feedbackcited by 748
  10. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instructcited by 625
  11. 2024LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuningcited by 532
  12. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 487
12 more
  1. 2023What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction Tuningcited by 364
  2. 2023Data Selection for Language Models via Importance Resamplingcited by 329
  3. 2023From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuningcited by 307
  4. 2024Superfiltering: Weak-to-Strong Data Filtering for Fast Instruction-Tuningcited by 138
  5. 2023Data Diversity Matters for Robust Instruction Tuningcited by 76
  6. 2023Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Taskscited by 55
  7. 2024Clustering and Ranking: Diversity-preserved Instruction Selection through Expert-aligned Quality Estimationcited by 53
  8. 2023Self-Evolved Diverse Data Sampling for Efficient Instruction Tuningcited by 52
  9. 2023LongForm: Effective Instruction Tuning with Reverse Instructionscited by 47
  10. 2024TSDS: Data Selection for Task-Specific Model Finetuningcited by 28
  11. 2025Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable Metriccited by 24
  12. 2023Data Selection for Fine-tuning Large Language Models Using Transferred Shapley Valuescited by 21

Built on by

Not cited yet.