mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Impact of Synthetic Lesional MR Images in Automated Focal Cortical Dysplasia Detection in Low-Data Scenarios

arXiv 2606.07381 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026eess.IV cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Background and Purpose: Automated detection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) requires large volumes of voxelwise lesion-delineated MRI data, which are difficult to acquire. This study aims to generate synthetic MRI data exhibiting FCD, assess their realism, and evaluate their impact on automated FCD detection, particularly in reducing the need for manual annotations. Methods: T1-weighted (T1w) and T2-weighted Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MRI scans from 131 FCD patients and 90 healthy controls from multiple (3) sites were retrospectively studied. Synthetic MRIs were generated by conditioning a generative network on binary FCD masks. Two neuroradiologists identified real images from a random set of 14 real and 14 synthetic scans. Three nnU-Net models were trained to detect FCD using: (i) real-only (35 FCD / 35 controls), (ii) real (35 FCD / 35 controls) plus synthetic augmentation, and (iii) expanded real data (70 FCD / 70 controls). Results: Experts showed limited ability to distinguish real from synthetic images, with classification accuracy of 60% for T1w and 70% for FLAIR (inter-rater agreement kappa = 0.86). Augmenting automated FCD detection with synthetic data increased sensitivity by 8.14% (p = 0.12) and improved model confidence at true lesion sites (0.83 +/- 0.11 to 0.89 +/- 0.12; p = 0.02). The expanded real-data model further improved sensitivity to 73.8% (p < 0.001) and confidence to 0.90 +/- 0.14 (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Conditional generative networks can generate realistic synthetic FCD-MRIs, reducing labeled data needs by approximately 20% while maintaining equivalent sensitivity. Equivalent amounts of real data, when available, remain more effective than synthetic augmentation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

9 of 33 references.

References · 9

  1. 2021SynthSeg: Segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retrainingcited by 235
  2. 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 235
  3. 2018Medical Image Synthesis for Data Augmentation and Anonymization using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 146
  4. 2023Conditional Diffusion Models for Semantic 3D Brain MRI Synthesiscited by 85
  5. 2023AI-Generated Images as Data Source: The Dawn of Synthetic Eracited by 13
  6. 2020Synthesizing brain tumor images and annotations by combining progressive growing GAN and SPADEcited by 9
  7. 2024Generative AI Enables Medical Image Segmentation in Ultra Low-Data Regimescited by 8
  8. 2024The Imaging Database for Epilepsy And Surgery (IDEAS)cited by 6
  9. 2025Domain-randomized deep learning for neuroimage analysiscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.