mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CultureScore: Evaluating Cultural Faithfulness in Video Generation Models

arXiv 2606.07311 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As video generation models like Veo 3.1 and LTX-2 advance, their ability to accurately represent diverse global cultures remains a critical yet understudied frontier. Current metrics, such as VideoScore, only measure visual quality but offer no mechanism for assessing cultural faithfulness. Consequently, a model that replaces a Namaste with a handshake receives the same score as one that generates the gesture correctly. We propose CultureScore, a compositional evaluation framework that decomposes cultural faithfulness into three granular dimensions: Identity (who is represented), Context (culturally localized background), and Behavior (normative gestures and interactions). We operationalize this framework through an evaluation suite spanning 10 countries, yielding 6,174 generated videos across three state-of-the-art models. Our evaluation reveals that no current model achieves culturally faithful video generation: the best-performing model reaches only 56.8% overall CultureScore, with Behavior the most challenging dimension; no model exceeds 52.1% on behavior. Furthermore, the highest-scoring model (LTX-2) on visual quality was ranked last by native annotators, while CultureScore's Behavior dimension shows the strongest positive correlation with human cultural judgment among the automatic metrics we evaluate, underscoring that cultural faithfulness is an essential criterion for equitable video generation. Data and code are publicly available.footnoteurlhttps://huggingface.co/datasets/ankurani/CultureScore

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 38 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,708
  3. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  4. 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,261
  5. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
  6. 2022Make-A-Video: Text-to-Video Generation without Text-Video Datacited by 1,742
  7. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
  8. 2024LTX-Video: Realtime Video Latent Diffusioncited by 581
  9. 2023VIEScore: Towards Explainable Metrics for Conditional Image Synthesis Evaluationcited by 201
  10. 2024VideoScore: Building Automatic Metrics to Simulate Fine-grained Human Feedback for Video Generationcited by 197
  11. 2024Benchmarking Vision Language Models for Cultural Understandingcited by 101
  12. 2023A Recipe for Scaling up Text-to-Video Generation with Text-free Videoscited by 51
8 more
  1. 2024VBench++: Comprehensive and Versatile Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 45
  2. 2024An image speaks a thousand words, but can everyone listen? On image transcreation for cultural relevancecited by 36
  3. 2024Grid Diffusion Models for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 21
  4. 2025CulturalFrames: Assessing Cultural Expectation Alignment in Text-to-Image Models and Evaluation Metricscited by 15
  5. 2025Diffusion Models Through a Global Lens: Are They Culturally Inclusive?cited by 14
  6. 2025Culture in Action: Evaluating Text-to-Image Models through Social Activitiescited by 10
  7. 2025CuRe: Cultural Gaps in the Long Tail of Text-to-Image Systemscited by 8
  8. 2025VF-Eval: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs for Generating Feedback on AIGC Videoscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.