CaliPPer: quantifying, predicting and improving AI model performance for binding prediction

Binding prediction models accelerate therapeutic antibody and TCR discovery, but their performance on new datasets is unpredictable, often leading to low discovery rates. Density-ratio methods (PAPE, M-CBPE) provide label-free performance estimation for binary classification, but their assumptions and aggregate-only outputs limit binding prediction on neoepitopes, antigen variants and chemical scaffolds. Here we present CaliPPer (Calibration and Prediction of Performance), a post-hoc framework pairing a multi-chain Sample-to-Domain Distance (S2DD) with distance-aware Bayesian recalibration, operating at three resolutions: generalisability score, aggregate performance prediction, and per-sample confidence. Across ten models, eight architectures and two immune-receptor domains, CaliPPer attains distance--performance correlations |r|=0.80--0.92, predicts AUROC/AP/F1 with mean absolute errors 0.008--0.070, and improves AUROC by up to +0.20 on unseen epitopes/variants. Applied retrospectively to five published TCR, BCR, MHC--peptide and small-molecule studies, CaliPPer raises true discovery rates in all five (e.g. 0/5 → 3/5 confirmed neoantigens), providing a triage layer between computational prediction and experimental validation.