mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Tight Bounds for Streaming Attention

arXiv 2606.07205 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026cs.DS cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: Efficient LLM inference and serving → KV cache optimization

Abstract (arXiv)

The attention mechanism is a cornerstone of modern transformer architectures. However, its expressive power comes at the cost of quadratic runtime and linear space usage. In particular, the classical transformer architecture explicitly stores all previously seen input elements (tokens) in order to generate the next one. The problem of implementing a transformer in limited space, known as KV cache compression, has received much interest over the past few years, spurring the development of powerful heuristics. Recent works of Haris et al, COLT'25 and Kochetkova et al, NeurIPS'25, formalized KV cache compression as the streaming attention approximation problem, providing both upper bounds (based on discrepancy theory) and information theoretic lower bounds. However, those papers left open a significant gap between the upper and lower bounds. For example, the space usage of their algorithms increases with the precision parameter, but the lower bound does not get stronger. In this work, we revisit the streaming attention approximation problem and provide nearly tight bounds on its space complexity. On the algorithmic side, we achieve the result through a surprisingly tight interplay between three distinct methods for kernel density estimation: discrepancy-based coreset constructions (e.g., Charikar-Kapralov-Waingarten'24), the polynomial method (e.g., Greengard-Rokhlin'87, Alman-Song'23), and space partitioning (e.g., Andoni-Laarhoven-Razenshteyn-Waingarten'17, Charikar-Kapralov-Nouri-Siminelakis'20). On the lower bound side, our main technical contribution is a new technique for using the INDEX problem with a large amount of side information that we hope will prove useful in other high dimensional geometric estimation problems.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in KV cache optimization, one of 12 directions in Efficient LLM inference and serving. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Bridging KV-Cache Quantization and Linear Attention: From Theory to Pretrained Weight Migration
  2. 2025Time and Memory Trade-off of KV-Cache Compression in Tensor Transformer Decoding
  3. 2026Tensor Cache: Eviction-conditioned Associative Memory for Transformers
  4. 2026AttSVD:Prompt-Adaptive Low-Rank KV Cache Compression via Attention-Guided SVD
  5. 2026LOOKAT: Lookup-Optimized Key-Attention for Memory-Efficient Transformers
  6. 2026The risk of KV cache compression
  7. 2026How Much Cache Does Reasoning Need? Depth-Cache Tradeoffs in KV-Compressed Transformers
  8. 2026KV Cache Compression Through the Lens of Transform Coding