mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

OPTIMUS-Prime: Minimal and Sufficient Concept Explanations for Deep Vision Models

arXiv 2606.07180 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The growing demand for transparency in automated decision-making has propelled eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to the forefront of machine learning research. In computer vision, however, existing explanation methods often prioritize end-user accessibility at the expense of formal guarantees, leaving a critical gap between practical utility and theoretical rigor. In this paper, we address this gap by introducing OPTIMUS, a novel framework for generating concept-based visual explanations for deep classification models. OPTIMUS explanations take the form of visual heatmaps that not only remain interpretable to end users, but are grounded in the well-established theory of prime implicants, providing formal guarantees that have been largely absent from existing saliency-based methods. Specifically, OPTIMUS explanations satisfy two desirable properties: sufficiency, ensuring that the highlighted concepts provably guarantee the classifier's prediction, and minimality, ensuring that no strict subset of those concepts retains this guarantee. Together, these properties yield explanations that are both logically tight and visually coherent. We validate our approach on a visual classification benchmark, demonstrating that OPTIMUS heatmaps naturally and faithfully surface the decision-relevant concepts underlying model predictions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2026.

Builds on

23 of 27 references.

References · 23

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  5. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  6. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  7. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  8. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  9. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  10. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
  11. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  12. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
11 more
  1. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  2. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  3. 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 255
  4. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 254
  5. 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 220
  6. 2017Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysiscited by 166
  7. 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
  8. 2019Superposition of many models into onecited by 64
  9. 2020Explaining Naive Bayes and Other Linear Classifiers with Polynomial Time and Delaycited by 57
  10. 2023On the Interpretability of Part-Prototype Based Classifiers: A Human Centric Analysiscited by 11
  11. 2025Formal Abductive Latent Explanations for Prototype-Based Networkscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.