mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RECAP: Regression Evaluation for Continual Adaptation of Prompts

arXiv 2606.06698 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

Abstract (arXiv)

Production agentic systems routinely face evolving constraints and must comply from the very next interaction. Scenarios like a tool-call notification changing a compliance threshold or a policy update adding disclosure requirements fit this criteria, having close to no room for errors in production. This proactive adaptation setting is common in deployment, but absent from current benchmarks, which assume either static constraint sets or reactive protocols with evaluation feedback. We introduce RECAP, a benchmark that measures continual-learning phenomena (forgetting, regression, forward transfer) at the constraint level under a strictly proactive adapt-then-test protocol: prompt optimization methods receive only the constraint specification and must generalize before seeing any test data. Evaluating six methods across five LLMs and three schedules with evolving constraints, we find that these methods show no significant improvement in performance, even after incurring a higher latency. These methods, designed for offline or reactive settings, are inadequate for the proactive paradigm. Our work emphasizes the growing need for designing proactive prompt adaptation methods, where the models must remain robust to evolving needs in deployment.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  2. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  3. 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
  4. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Trainingcited by 1,053
  5. 2021Learning to Prompt for Continual Learningcited by 944
  6. 2023Large Language Models as Optimizerscited by 864
  7. 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 832
  8. 2018Riemannian Walk for Incremental Learning: Understanding Forgetting and Intransigencecited by 742
  9. 2022DualPrompt: Complementary Prompting for Rehearsal-free Continual Learningcited by 642
  10. 2025Agentic Context Engineering: Evolving Contexts for Self-Improving Language Modelscited by 398
  11. 2024Optimizing Instructions and Demonstrations for Multi-Stage Language Model Programscited by 291
  12. 2024Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 234
5 more
  1. 2025Dynamic Cheatsheet: Test-Time Learning with Adaptive Memorycited by 163
  2. 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 135
  3. 2025CRANE: Reasoning with constrained LLM generationcited by 38
  4. 2025RECAST: Expanding the Boundaries of LLMs' Complex Instruction Following with Multi-Constraint Datacited by 12
  5. 2026CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraintscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026ContinualSkillBench: Can LLM Agents Truly Evolve Their Capabilities?
  2. 2026PID-Gated Continual Prompt Adaptation Under Noisy Feedback
  3. 2025Adaptation of Agentic AI: A Survey of Post-Training, Memory, and Skills
  4. 2026Graph-based Target Back-Propagation for Context Adaptation in Multi-LLM Agentic Systems
  5. 2026SkillZip: Evaluation-Free Skill Compression for Self-Evolving Agents by Discovering Reusable Structure
  6. 2026Experience Funnel: A State-Policy Alternating Loop for Self-Evolving Agents
  7. 2026SkillAdaptor: Self-Adapting Skills for LLM Agents from Trajectories
  8. 2026SkillHone: A Harness for Continual Agent Skill Evolution Through Persistent Decision History