mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AttackPathGNN: Cross-function vulnerability detection in smart contracts using state interference graphs and conjunction pooling

arXiv 2606.05986 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing learning-based detectors for Solidity smart-contracts reduce vulnerability detection to syntactic pattern matching within single functions, yet many of the most consequential exploits (The DAO, Cream Finance) exist not in any individual function but in the relationship between functions and in the combination of conditions that made the attack feasible. Thus, we propose AttackPathGNN, a graph neural network (GNN) that reframes detection as reasoning over explicit attack paths. Two architectural choices distinguish it from prior GNN-based detectors: (1)a State Interference Graph that links every pair of functions sharing mutable storage through typed, weighted edges and through directed reentrancy-path edges defined by an explicit five-condition predicate; (2)conjunction pooling, a differentiable AND-aggregator over eight named exploit preconditions whose log-sigmoid form causes the per-function exploit score to collapse whenever any single mitigation (a reentrancy guard, an access-control modifier or SafeMath) is in place. Across five independent training runs, AttackPathGNN attains 92.3+/-0.2% F1 on the SmartBugs Wild held-out test partition (4.3+/-0.3% false-negative rate, 90.8+/-2.5% detection rate on the independently human-labelled SmartBugs Curated benchmark), recovering 6/10 DASP10 categories at 100% on every seed and Reentrancy at 98.7+/-1.8%. Each prediction is emitted with a structured remediation report, turning each verdict into an actionable, function-level audit finding.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 37 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
  3. 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
  4. 2021On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorationscited by 281
  5. 2019Devign: Effective Vulnerability Identification by Learning Comprehensive Program Semantics via Graph Neural Networkscited by 272
  6. 2020Logical Neural Networkscited by 119
  7. 2018Automated Vulnerability Detection in Source Code Using Deep Representation Learningcited by 114
  8. 2020Analyzing Differentiable Fuzzy Logic Operatorscited by 101
  9. 2017Logic Tensor Networks for Semantic Image Interpretationcited by 92
  10. 2018Securify: Practical Security Analysis of Smart Contractscited by 61
  11. 2019Empirical Review of Automated Analysis Tools on 47,587 Ethereum Smart Contractscited by 36
  12. 2021Combining Graph Neural Networks with Expert Knowledge for Smart Contract Vulnerability Detectioncited by 34
6 more
  1. 2022SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Attackscited by 28
  2. 2018Finding The Greedy, Prodigal, and Suicidal Contracts at Scalecited by 19
  3. 2018Sereum: Protecting Existing Smart Contracts Against Re-Entrancy Attackscited by 17
  4. 2021SAILFISH: Vetting Smart Contract State-Inconsistency Bugs in Secondscited by 10
  5. 2023Smart Contract and DeFi Security Tools: Do They Meet the Needs of Practitioners?cited by 8
  6. 2022MANDO: Multi-Level Heterogeneous Graph Embeddings for Fine-Grained Detection of Smart Contract Vulnerabilitiescited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.