mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Analysis of the Neglect-Zero Effect in Large Language Models

arXiv 2606.05864 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate the extent to which the language processing of LLMs resembles human cognitive processes, focusing on a human cognitive bias called the textitneglect-zero effect. This effect refers to the human tendency to ignore textitzero-models, which are configurations that render a proposition vacuously true by virtue of an empty set. We focus on two types of inferences driven by the neglect-zero effect, and examine how LLMs process these inferences by comparing their behavior with that in an inference that does not involve the neglect-zero effect. For this purpose, we employ a paradigm based on textitstructural priming, where recent exposure to a preceding sentence (the textitprime) facilitates the processing of a subsequent sentence (the textittarget) due to their structural similarity. We prepare primes to force LLMs to consider the zero-model, and analyze whether they also consider it in the target. The results suggest that the neglect-zero effect may not occur in the LLMs analyzed in this study. Our code is available at https://github.com/ynklab/neglectzero

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

4 of 13 references.

References · 4

  1. 2024Large Language Models and Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review of Similarities, Differences, and Challengescited by 49
  2. 2024Do Language Models Exhibit Human-like Structural Priming Effects?cited by 21
  3. 2020Inflecting when there's no majority: Limitations of encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models for German pluralscited by 13
  4. 2024Experimental Pragmatics with Machines: Testing LLM Predictions for the Inferences of Plain and Embedded Disjunctionscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.