mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated Proving of Shannon-Type Entropy Inequalities via Fine-Tuned Language Models and Guided Tree Search

arXiv 2606.05729 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2026cs.IT cs.LG math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Proving Shannon-type entropy inequalities is a fundamental task in information theory that often requires constructing non-trivial linear combinations of known constraints, which is a combinatorial search problem that scales poorly with the number of random variables. We investigate whether small-scale large language models (0.6B--1.7B parameters), fine-tuned on atomic proof steps and combined with guided beam search, can automate this process. On a held-out test set of 60 inequalities spanning n=10 to 15 variables, our 0.6B fine-tuned model achieves an 85% proof success rate with tree search. GPT-5.5 solves 1.7% samples under zero-shot prompting while Psitip solves 33.3% samples. A systematic ablation study across training context length (4096 vs. 8192 tokens) and data distribution (n=9-skewed vs not skewed) reveals that a 4096-token not skewed training distribution yields the best performance, with extended context and skewed data providing no marginal benefit. We further identify two dominant failure modes -- format failures and step quality degradation -- and verify that the beam-scoring heuristic is essential via a controlled ablation (random scoring reduces success from 83% to 23%).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 34 references.

References · 20

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  4. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
  5. 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
  6. 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 227
  7. 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Datacited by 225
  8. 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 192
  9. 2022Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learningcited by 141
  10. 2022Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Proverscited by 97
  11. 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 95
  12. 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 82
8 more
  1. 2018Reinforcement Learning of Theorem Provingcited by 69
  2. 2024Lean Copilot: Large Language Models as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Leancited by 52
  3. 2024Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4cited by 45
  4. 2017Premise Selection for Theorem Proving by Deep Graph Embeddingcited by 44
  5. 2024Formal Theorem Proving by Rewarding LLMs to Decompose Proofs Hierarchicallycited by 22
  6. 2024Proving Olympiad Algebraic Inequalities without Human Demonstrationscited by 20
  7. 2024Proof Automation with Large Language Modelscited by 20
  8. 2025ProofOptimizer: Training Language Models to Simplify Proofs without Human Demonstrationscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.