Automated Proving of Shannon-Type Entropy Inequalities via Fine-Tuned Language Models and Guided Tree Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Proving Shannon-type entropy inequalities is a fundamental task in information theory that often requires constructing non-trivial linear combinations of known constraints, which is a combinatorial search problem that scales poorly with the number of random variables. We investigate whether small-scale large language models (0.6B--1.7B parameters), fine-tuned on atomic proof steps and combined with guided beam search, can automate this process. On a held-out test set of 60 inequalities spanning n=10 to 15 variables, our 0.6B fine-tuned model achieves an 85% proof success rate with tree search. GPT-5.5 solves 1.7% samples under zero-shot prompting while Psitip solves 33.3% samples. A systematic ablation study across training context length (4096 vs. 8192 tokens) and data distribution (n=9-skewed vs not skewed) reveals that a 4096-token not skewed training distribution yields the best performance, with extended context and skewed data providing no marginal benefit. We further identify two dominant failure modes -- format failures and step quality degradation -- and verify that the beam-scoring heuristic is essential via a controlled ablation (random scoring reduces success from 83% to 23%).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2026.
Builds on
20 of 34 references.
References · 20
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 948
- 2020Generative Language Modeling for Automated Theorem Provingcited by 379
- 2024FrontierMath: A Benchmark for Evaluating Advanced Mathematical Reasoning in AIcited by 227
- 2024DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Datacited by 225
- 2022HyperTree Proof Search for Neural Theorem Provingcited by 192
- 2022Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learningcited by 141
- 2022Thor: Wielding Hammers to Integrate Language Models and Automated Theorem Proverscited by 97
- 2025Gold-medalist Performance in Solving Olympiad Geometry with AlphaGeometry2cited by 95
- 2025BFS-Prover: Scalable Best-First Tree Search for LLM-based Automatic Theorem Provingcited by 82
8 more
- 2018Reinforcement Learning of Theorem Provingcited by 69
- 2024Lean Copilot: Large Language Models as Copilots for Theorem Proving in Leancited by 52
- 2024Process-Driven Autoformalization in Lean 4cited by 45
- 2017Premise Selection for Theorem Proving by Deep Graph Embeddingcited by 44
- 2024Formal Theorem Proving by Rewarding LLMs to Decompose Proofs Hierarchicallycited by 22
- 2024Proving Olympiad Algebraic Inequalities without Human Demonstrationscited by 20
- 2024Proof Automation with Large Language Modelscited by 20
- 2025ProofOptimizer: Training Language Models to Simplify Proofs without Human Demonstrationscited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.