ORACLE-CT: Anatomy-Aware Support Pooling for CT Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Abdominal CT disease classification is challenging because each scan is a large 3D volume with many possible findings, while diagnostic evidence is often confined to specific organs or anatomical compartments. Most study-level classifiers aggregate encoder features using anatomy-agnostic pooling or attention, creating a mismatch between localized disease evidence and global evidence aggregation. We propose ORACLE--CT, an encoder-agnostic anatomy-aware aggregation framework that uses multi-organ segmentation to define label-specific anatomical supports and restrict attention pooling to relevant regions. The framework supports single-organ, multi-organ union, comparative, localized, and global support strategies. We evaluate ORACLE--CT with three encoder families: DINOv3, I3D--ResNet-121, and the radiology-native Pillar--0 encoder. Models are trained end-to-end on MERLIN and evaluated internally and under frozen external transfer to Duke--Abdomen and AMOS. Compared with global average pooling, support-masked pooling improved MERLIN macro-AUROC/AUPRC from 0.838/0.638 to 0.858/0.676 for DINOv3 and from 0.829/0.617 to 0.848/0.659 for I3D--ResNet-121. On harmonized 10-label external evaluation, DINOv3 improved on Duke--Abdomen from 0.802/0.628 to 0.835/0.683 and on AMOS from 0.742/0.313 to 0.762/0.350, with similar gains for I3D--ResNet-121. For Pillar--0, most gains came from learned attention, with smaller additional benefit from anatomical masking. ORACLE--CT improves discrimination and external robustness while preserving an auditable link between predictions and anatomical evidence.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 40 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
- 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
- 2017Deep Setscited by 1,394
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2015Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,024
11 more
- 2013Network In Networkcited by 600
- 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 597
- 2020Machine-Learning-Based Multiple Abnormality Prediction with Large-Scale Chest Computed Tomography Volumescited by 66
- 2025Large-scale and Fine-grained Vision-language Pre-training for Enhanced CT Image Understandingcited by 53
- 2024CT-GLIP: 3D Grounded Language-Image Pretraining with CT Scans and Radiology Reports for Full-Body Scenarioscited by 29
- 2025Pillar-0: A New Frontier for Radiology Foundation Modelscited by 24
- 2025Comprehensive language-image pre-training for 3D medical image understandingcited by 20
- 2020Classification of Multiple Diseases on Body CT Scans using Weakly Supervised Deep Learningcited by 13
- 2025Unified Supervision For Vision-Language Modeling in 3D Computed Tomographycited by 4
- 2025Zero-Shot Multi-Disease Labeling of Chest, Abdomen, and Pelvis CT Reports Using Open-Weight Large Language Models: The Effect of Labeling Conventionscited by 2
- 2026GreenRFM: Learning a resource-efficient radiology vision-language foundation model via supervision-centric pre-trainingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.