mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Executable Schema Contracts: From Automatic Ingestion to Multi-Source Retrieval

arXiv 2606.05415 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Real-world data spans tables, documents, and semi-structured files with implicit semantics. Querying this data requires integrating evidence across inconsistent schemas and formats, yet existing approaches either demand costly manual engineering or bypass structure entirely. We present a system that automatically discovers an executable schema from raw multi-source data and uses it as a shared contract for knowledge graph construction and query-time retrieval. A closed-world field catalog constrains LLM-based schema discovery to attested fields; deterministic structural analysis infers identity keys, foreign keys, and source hierarchy; and the resulting schema drives extraction, deduplication, and cross-source linking into a provenance-aware knowledge graph. At query time the schema -- optionally extended via a monotonic protocol -- conditions a multi-tool agent routing retrieval across structured lookup, graph traversal, and vector search, returning grounded answers with traceable citations. In controlled zero-shot comparisons using the same LLM, data, and evaluation harness, the system improves over retrieval-only and decomposition-based baselines across four QA benchmarks, with ablations showing that schema-conditioned routing, structural intelligence, and schema-guided construction each contribute to the gains.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

Builds on

19 of 40 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  4. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  5. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  6. 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIscited by 1,880
  7. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,411
  8. 2020Constructing A Multi-hop QA Dataset for Comprehensive Evaluation of Reasoning Stepscited by 1,259
  9. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  10. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
  11. 2021TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Financecited by 402
  12. 2023Think-on-Graph: Deep and Responsible Reasoning of Large Language Model on Knowledge Graphcited by 235
7 more
  1. 2024Seven Failure Points When Engineering a Retrieval Augmented Generation Systemcited by 138
  2. 2024STaRK: Benchmarking LLM Retrieval on Textual and Relational Knowledge Basescited by 53
  3. 2024Match, Compare, or Select? An Investigation of Large Language Models for Entity Matchingcited by 32
  4. 2024Text2Cypher: Bridging Natural Language and Graph Databasescited by 30
  5. 2023Towards Robust Temporal Reasoning of Large Language Models via a Multi-Hop QA Dataset and Pseudo-Instruction Tuningcited by 18
  6. 2024AtomR: Atomic Operator-Empowered Large Language Models for Heterogeneous Knowledge Reasoningcited by 10
  7. 2025Hybrid Graphs for Table-and-Text based Question Answering using LLMscited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.