mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Context-as-AI-Service: Surfacing Cross-File Dependency Chains for LLM-Generated Developer Documentation

arXiv 2606.04397 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.IRcited by 1

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents increasingly write and maintain developer documentation, but usefulness and accuracy often rely on dependency chains that are not obvious to follow. Even with more files in context, the agent must still decide which cross-file dependencies to trace. We present Context-as-AI-Service (CAIS), a retrieval layer that LLM agents query to find evidence across the codebase as they review or generate documentation. CAIS indexes source code, API references, and upstream documentation, then enables agents to query the index through tool calls that combine keyword and semantic search. We evaluate CAIS in two case studies using Claude Sonnet 4.6 on a production SDK: improving API reference comments in a core source file and validating an LLM-generated tutorial. In both studies, the baseline already had ordinary repository tools such as file reads, keyword search, and symbol navigation. CAIS adds a retrieval layer on top, so the comparison isolates added retrieval rather than basic repository access. In the API-reference review, the CAIS-augmented agent produced the same 5 missing-documentation fixes as the baseline and surfaced 4 findings the baseline missed: 2 cross-file factual errors and 2 underspecified API comments. In the tutorial validation, it surfaced 1 executable bug, 1 API-usage improvement, and 2 missing prerequisites that the baseline pipeline did not catch. These findings required tracing non-obvious dependency chains across utility files, framework internals, usage examples, tests, and component-creation logic. Over five runs per condition, adding CAIS reduced wall-clock time by 22% to 34% across the two tasks and lowered input-token usage.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Context Engineering for Multi-Agent LLM Code Assistants Using Elicit, NotebookLM, ChatGPT, and Claude Code
  2. 2025AI-Generated Code Is Not Reproducible (Yet): An Empirical Study of Dependency Gaps in LLM-Based Coding Agents
  3. 2026Diagnosing Knowledge Gaps in LLM Tool Use: An Agentic Benchmark for Novel API Acquisition
  4. 2026ReCUBE: Evaluating Repository-Level Context Utilization in Code Generation
  5. 2026CodeTeam: An LLM-Powered Multi-Agent Framework for Repository-Level Code Generation
  6. 2026Evaluating AGENTS.md: Are Repository-Level Context Files Helpful for Coding Agents?
  7. 2025When LLMs Meet API Documentation: Can Retrieval Augmentation Aid Code Generation Just as It Helps Developers?
  8. 2026When LLMs Lag Behind: Knowledge Conflicts from Evolving APIs in Code Generation