mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Spatially Grounded Concept Bottleneck Models via Part-Factorized Attention

arXiv 2606.04364 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concept bottleneck models (CBMs) predict a layer of human-named attributes before predicting a class, which makes their decisions auditable. On fine-grained recognition tasks, though, the concept heads are usually free to attend anywhere in the image, so a head named for one body region can be satisfied by evidence on another, and the model reaches the right answer for the wrong reason. We propose a part-factorized CBM (PF-CBM) that removes this freedom by construction. A frozen DINOv3 vision transformer feeds a set of part queries, each tied by name to a specific anatomical region through a fixed concept-to-part map, while whole-object attributes such as size and shape are handled separately by a query with no spatial prior, since they are not anchored to any single body part. A learnable Gaussian prior over patch locations, initialized from average keypoint positions, keeps the part queries from collapsing onto the same evidence. On its own this prior spreads the queries apart but does not reliably land them on the correct anatomy. What closes that gap is a lightweight alignment loss that nudges each part query toward its keypoint, and the central finding of this paper is how little of that supervision is required. Aligning on well under one percent of the training images already moves pointing accuracy from near-chance to roughly three-quarters of what full keypoint supervision achieves, and the gains continue, more slowly, as more annotated images are added. Classification accuracy on CUB-200-2011 barely moves across this entire range and stays within a point of a fully supervised baseline whether the model sees no keypoints at all or every one of them. Grounding a CBM's attention to the right evidence turns out to be nearly free in accuracy and cheap in annotation, provided the model has the right inductive bias to make efficient use of that small amount of supervision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2026.

Builds on

16 of 19 references.

References · 16

  1. 2025DINOv3cited by 1,414
  2. 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,103
  3. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  4. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  5. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 737
  6. 2022Language in a Bottle: Language Model Guided Concept Bottlenecks for Interpretable Image Classificationcited by 312
  7. 2022Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 293
  8. 2023Label-Free Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 285
  9. 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 131
  10. 2024VLG-CBM: Training Concept Bottleneck Models with Vision-Language Guidancecited by 65
  11. 2024Interpretable Image Classification with Adaptive Prototype-based Vision Transformerscited by 25
  12. 2023PDiscoNet: Semantically consistent part discovery for fine-grained recognitioncited by 21
4 more
  1. 2024DCBM: Data-Efficient Visual Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 16
  2. 2025Discovering Fine-Grained Visual-Concept Relations by Disentangled Optimal Transport Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 12
  3. 2024PDiscoFormer: Relaxing Part Discovery Constraints with Vision Transformerscited by 9
  4. 2023Spotlight Attention: Robust Object-Centric Learning With a Spatial Locality Priorcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.