mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond Compression: Quantifying Spectral Accessibility in Vision Representations

arXiv 2606.03795 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 1

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-language models map visual features into a shared embedding space through learned projection layers, yet it remains unclear how these transformations alter the structure of visual information. This study examines changes in representation through spatial-frequency accessibility, measured by the linear recoverability of band-limited Fourier energy from model representations. To isolate effects beyond dimensionality reduction, we introduce Residual Spectral Loss (RSL), which evaluates changes relative to a dimension-matched random projection baseline. To reduce confounding effects from optimization, the analysis uses pretrained models with all parameters frozen. The experimental results show consistent frequency-dependent changes in accessibility across CLIP and DINOv2 on ImageNet and MS-COCO datasets. Spectral accessibility follows a non-monotonic trajectory across depth, peaking at intermediate layers before decreasing toward the output representation. The final transformation differs across architectures: CLIP's learned projection is spectrally neutral, with changes explained by compression, whereas DINOv2's [CLS] pooling induces a structured loss across the spectrum. These findings identify intermediate layers and pooling mechanisms as primary drivers of spectral transformation in modern vision encoders.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

14 of 23 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  5. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
  6. 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
  7. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
  8. 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
  9. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  10. 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 396
  11. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  12. 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
2 more
  1. 2022Anti-Oversmoothing in Deep Vision Transformers via the Fourier Domain Analysis: From Theory to Practicecited by 136
  2. 2021On the Frequency Bias of Generative Modelscited by 60

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Lost in Embeddings: Information Loss in Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention
  3. 2026Your CLIP has 164 dimensions of noise: Exploring the embeddings covariance eigenspectrum of contrastively pretrained vision-language transformers
  4. 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinks
  5. 2025Fourier Compressor: Frequency-Domain Visual Token Compression for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2025Test-Time Spectrum-Aware Latent Steering for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models
  7. 2025From Per-Image Low-Rank to Encoding Mismatch: Rethinking Feature Distillation in Vision Transformers
  8. 2026SPECTRA-VLA: Base-Fine Hyperspectral Token Transfer at Frozen Vision-Language-Action Interfaces