Beyond Compression: Quantifying Spectral Accessibility in Vision Representations
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision-language models map visual features into a shared embedding space through learned projection layers, yet it remains unclear how these transformations alter the structure of visual information. This study examines changes in representation through spatial-frequency accessibility, measured by the linear recoverability of band-limited Fourier energy from model representations. To isolate effects beyond dimensionality reduction, we introduce Residual Spectral Loss (RSL), which evaluates changes relative to a dimension-matched random projection baseline. To reduce confounding effects from optimization, the analysis uses pretrained models with all parameters frozen. The experimental results show consistent frequency-dependent changes in accessibility across CLIP and DINOv2 on ImageNet and MS-COCO datasets. Spectral accessibility follows a non-monotonic trajectory across depth, peaking at intermediate layers before decreasing toward the output representation. The final transformation differs across architectures: CLIP's learned projection is spectrally neutral, with changes explained by compression, whereas DINOv2's [CLS] pooling induces a structured loss across the spectrum. These findings identify intermediate layers and pooling mechanisms as primary drivers of spectral transformation in modern vision encoders.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
14 of 23 references.
References · 14
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 871
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 675
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2021Early Convolutions Help Transformers See Bettercited by 396
- 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Lost in Embeddings: Information Loss in Vision-Language Models
- 2026Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention
- 2026Your CLIP has 164 dimensions of noise: Exploring the embeddings covariance eigenspectrum of contrastively pretrained vision-language transformers
- 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinks
- 2025Fourier Compressor: Frequency-Domain Visual Token Compression for Vision-Language Models
- 2025Test-Time Spectrum-Aware Latent Steering for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Models
- 2025From Per-Image Low-Rank to Encoding Mismatch: Rethinking Feature Distillation in Vision Transformers
- 2026SPECTRA-VLA: Base-Fine Hyperspectral Token Transfer at Frozen Vision-Language-Action Interfaces