mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Tonal parsimony in chord-sequence analysis: combining modulation cost and tonal vocabulary

arXiv 2606.03459 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2026cs.SD cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the assignment of local tonalities to chord sequences, a task useful for harmonic analysis, composition, and jazz-oriented improvisation. Standard dynamic-programming approaches minimize modulations but can introduce unnecessarily many tonal centers. We compare this transition-only objective with pure minimum-vocabulary analysis and with tonal parsimony, which minimizes lexicographically the number of modulations and then the number of distinct tonalities. Although this joint objective is combinatorially hard in general, we give exact algorithms exploiting the fixed 24-tonality major/minor universe. On 31,032 LMD Chords sequences, tonal parsimony preserves the transition optimum while reducing tonal vocabulary in 55.8% of cases. With weighted jazz-substitution closure, it lowers mean tonalities from 3.802 to 3.206 and modulations from 16.728 to 12.141. On 1,555 annotated jazz standards, it improves compatible chord-scale agreement to 95.6%, supporting tractable professional-scale harmonic analysis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.

Builds on

3 of 19 references.

References · 3

  1. 2024Engraving Oriented Joint Estimation of Pitch Spelling and Local and Global Keyscited by 3
  2. 2017Generative Statistical Models with Self-Emergent Grammar of Chord Sequencescited by 2
  3. 2026Exact Regular-Constrained Variable-Order Markov Generation via Sparse Context-State Belief Propagationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.