Lingo_Research_Group at SemEval-2026 Task 9: Evaluating Prompt Variants for Polarization Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Our submission presented in this paper is for SemEval-2026 Task 9: Multilingual Text Classification Challenge - Polarization Detection and it covers all three subtasks: (1) binary polarization detection, (2) polarization type classification and (3) polarization manifestation identification. We adopt a systematic approach of research on short designed prompts by considering twelve designed prompts that are different in terminology clarity, detail of the definition, guidance of reasoning and in-context examples use. The experiments are conducted using aya-101 and Gemma3-27B, with the latter chosen for the submission at the end of the development through performance considerations. Our system has an average macro level F1-score of 0.762 on Subtask 1, 0.587 on Subtask 2 and 0.444 on Subtask 3 with the average accuracy of 0.819, 0.678 and 0.498, respectively, on the official test set averaged among 22 languages, respectively. With cross-task and cross-lingual analysis, we demonstrate that prompt-based approaches can be used effectively to detect coarse grained polarization but encounter more and more difficulties as far as fine-grained and multi-label sociolinguistic classification is concerned.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
5 of 8 references.
References · 5
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
- 2024Polarization Detection on Social Networks: dual contrastive objectives for Self-supervisioncited by 2
- 2026SemEval-2026 Task 9: Detecting Multilingual, Multicultural and Multievent Online Polarizationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.