TriEval: A Resource-Efficient Pipeline for LLM Bias, Toxicity, and Truthfulness Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LLMs have evolved from basic chatbots to the backbone of the AI ecosystem, now widely used in healthcare, schools, and government services. The domain-wide adoption of LLMs necessitates continuous evaluation to ensure their safety and fairness. Common issues encountered after deploying LLMs include inconsistent outputs and hallucinations of incorrect information. Although numerous LLM evaluation tools exist, most are limited to testing a single parameter at a time or require massive computational resources that are not accessible to most researchers. TriEval addresses these challenges by evaluating LLM outputs across multiple parameters, including bias, toxicity, and truthfulness together, while minimizing computing resources. The pipeline is compatible with both open- and closed-source models and runs on a standard laptop without a GPU cluster. TriEval has been tested on four models: Llama 3 8B, Mistral 7B, Gemma 2 9B, and Claude Haiku. The results show clear differences between open-source and closed-source models, especially in terms of toxicity and truthfulness. TriEval is being released as open source to enable broader access for researchers with limited computational resources.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
34 of 44 references.
References · 34
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,065
- 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 2,914
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
22 more
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
- 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,227
- 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
- 2022Red Teaming Language Models with Language Modelscited by 983
- 2021Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Modelscited by 957
- 2020StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language modelscited by 911
- 2024Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technologycited by 889
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 477
- 2022ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detectioncited by 419
- 2020Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)cited by 318
- 2023MEGA: Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AIcited by 291
- 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 180
- 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 137
- 2023BiasAsker: Measuring the Bias in Conversational AI Systemcited by 52
- 2024Assessing Adversarial Robustness of Large Language Models: An Empirical Studycited by 21
- 2025Large language models provide unsafe answers to patient-posed medical questionscited by 17
Built on by
Not cited yet.