DriftSched: Adaptive QoS-Aware Scheduling under Runtime Token Drift for Multi-Tenant GPU Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapid growth of large language model (LLM) inference services has increased the demand for efficient multi-tenant GPU scheduling. While modern inference runtimes such as vLLM improve throughput through continuous batching and optimized memory management, accurately estimating the runtime cost of heterogeneous inference requests remains challenging. In practice, admission-time workload estimates may deviate from observed execution behavior, leading to workload misclassification, queue imbalance, increased tail latency, and degraded Quality-of-Service (QoS). This paper presents DriftSched, a QoS-aware scheduling framework for multi-tenant LLM inference serving on NVIDIA L4 GPUs. DriftSched combines workload classification, token-budget estimation, tenant-aware queue management, and an online feedback mechanism to refine workload estimates using runtime observations. The framework evaluates FIFO, Priority, Weighted, Shortest-Job-First (SJF), and Aging Priority scheduling policies under heterogeneous multi-tenant workloads. Experimental results show that adaptive calibration reduces workload estimation error by an average of 38.8% (MAE) and 40.5% (RMSE), improving workload classification stability. Among all evaluated schedulers, SJF achieves the best overall performance, reducing median end-to-end latency by approximately 42% and P99 latency by approximately 16% relative to FIFO under sustained GPU contention. The results further indicate that scheduler selection has a greater impact on latency behavior than runtime calibration alone, while accurate workload characterization largely eliminates systematic estimation drift. This work contributes a reproducible framework for studying workload-estimation fidelity and QoS-aware scheduling in multi-tenant GPU inference systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2026.
Builds on
7 of 25 references.
References · 7
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2023SGLang: Efficient Execution of Structured Language Model Programscited by 1,141
- 2026GDEV-AI: A Generalized Evaluation of Deep Learning Inference Scaling and Architectural Saturationcited by 2
- 2026DEEP-GAP: Deep-learning Evaluation of Execution Parallelism in GPU Architectural Performancecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026A Queueing-Theoretic Framework for Stability Analysis of LLM Inference with KV Cache Memory Constraints
- 2025Optimizing LLM Inference: Fluid-Guided Online Scheduling with Memory Constraints
- 2024NEO: Saving GPU Memory Crisis with CPU Offloading for Online LLM Inference
- 2026LLMVisor: A Real-Time Latency Attribution Model for Multi-Tenant LLM Serving
- 2024Saving GPU Hours in LLM Inference System Development and Online Workloads with Simulation and DBMS-Inspired Cache Replacement Policies
- 2025LeMix: Unified Scheduling for LLM Training and Inference on Multi-GPU Systems
- 2026OmniPilot: An Uncertainty-Aware LLM Inference Advisor for Heterogeneous GPU Clusters ↗
- 2024AQUA: Network-Accelerated Memory Offloading for LLMs in Scale-Up GPU Domains