mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Spectral Audit of In-Context Operator Networks

arXiv 2606.02427 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing evaluations of neural operators and in-context operator learning rely primarily on prediction error, but accurate output prediction does not guarantee the correct local dynamical structure. A model may match solutions while exhibiting incorrect sensitivities, distorted frequency response, spurious mode coupling, or unstable tangent behavior. We introduce a Jacobian-based spectral audit for in-context operator learning. For a fixed prompt, we differentiate the network output with respect to the query function and view the resulting Jacobian as a learned tangent operator. Projecting it onto Fourier modes, we obtain a local spectral characterization of the inferred operator, including frequency-dependent gains, phase structure, and cross-mode coupling. The audit complements standard prediction metrics by testing whether the model reproduces local mechanisms of the underlying PDE operator rather than only outputs. Across benchmarks, the audit reveals distinct operator-level phenomena, including phase transport, viscosity-dependent damping, nonlinear mode coupling, and reaction--diffusion stability structure. It also detects failures partially hidden by prediction-error metrics, including high-frequency degradation, incorrect phase recovery, and prompt--operator inconsistencies. Corrupted or internally inconsistent prompts lead to degraded tangent-operator structure even when pointwise predictions remain partially accurate. Our results suggest that prediction accuracy and local operator fidelity are distinct properties of learned neural operators. Our framework also provides a diagnostic for stability, sensitivity, and operator consistency.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

12 of 24 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  3. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  4. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  5. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
  6. 2018Conditional Neural Processescited by 421
  7. 2023In-Context Operator Learning with Data Prompts for Differential Equation Problemscited by 98
  8. 2022Wavelet neural operator: a neural operator for parametric partial differential equationscited by 77
  9. 2024PDE Generalization of In-Context Operator Networks: A Study on 1D Scalar Nonlinear Conservation Lawscited by 30
  10. 2025Sensitivity-Constrained Fourier Neural Operators for Forward and Inverse Problems in Parametric Differential Equationscited by 14
  11. 2026Spectral bias in physics-informed and operator learning: Analysis and mitigation guidelinescited by 6
  12. 2024A Digital Twin for Diesel Engines: Operator-infused Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Transfer Learning for Engine Health Monitoringcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.