mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

AutoForest: Automatically Generating Forest Plots from Biomedical Studies with End-to-End Evidence Extraction and Synthesis

arXiv 2606.02403 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematic reviews rely on forest plots to synthesise quantitative evidence across biomedical studies, but generating them remains a fragmented and labour-intensive process. Researchers must interpret complex clinical texts, manually extract outcome data from trials, define appropriate interventions and comparators, harmonise inconsistent study designs, and carry out meta-analytic computations-typically using specialised software that demands structured inputs and domain expertise. While recent work has demonstrated that large language models can extract study-level data from unstructured text, no existing system automates the complete pipeline from raw documents to synthesised forest plots. To address this gap, we introduce AutoForest, the first end-to-end system that generates publication-ready forest plots directly from biomedical papers. Given one or more study papers, AutoForest automatically suggests ICO (Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) elements, extracts outcome data, performs statistical synthesis, and renders the final forest plot. We describe the system architecture, user interface and demonstrate its effectiveness on real-world examples through a user study involving clinicians, showing how AutoForest can accelerate evidence synthesis and substantially lower the barrier to conducting meta-analyses.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 27 references.

References · 8

  1. 2025Docling: An Efficient Open-Source Toolkit for AI-driven Document Conversioncited by 58
  2. 2023Can large language models replace humans in the systematic review process? Evaluating GPT-4's efficacy in screening and extracting data from peer-reviewed and grey literature in multiple languagescited by 36
  3. 2026Beyond Outcome Verification: Verifiable Process Reward Models for Structured Reasoningcited by 12
  4. 2025Advanced Layout Analysis Models for Doclingcited by 6
  5. 2024Measuring Risk of Bias in Biomedical Reports: The RoBBR Benchmarkcited by 4
  6. 2025Completing A Systematic Review in Hours instead of Months with Interactive AI Agentscited by 4
  7. 2025Query-driven Document-level Scientific Evidence Extraction from Biomedical Studiescited by 3
  8. 2025Enhancing Study-Level Inference from Clinical Trial Papers via Reinforcement Learning-Based Numeric Reasoningcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.