mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Parameter-efficient Dual-encoder Architecture with Differentiable Choquet Integral Fusion for Underwater Acoustic Classification

arXiv 2606.02341 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026cs.SD cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Underwater acoustic classification has a wide array of oceanic applications, but faces challenges due to an increasingly complex acoustic environment. Waveform and spectrogram representations have been primarily used as acoustic data features for classification tasks in this domain. Spectrograms model harmonic dependencies, but these reduced representations can filter out acoustic features relevant for discrimination. While phase information from the waveform allows full characterization of the signal, the original waveform can be noisy and complex, rendering this representation difficult for models to process directly. This paper proposes a dual-encoder neural architecture to simultaneously process acoustic waveforms and spectrograms, leveraging pre-trained backbones and parameter-efficient fine-tuning modules, enabling a domain adaptation. To combine these adapted branches, a novel differentiable fuzzy aggregation mechanism based on the Choquet integral is introduced to balance the temporal and spectral representations. This fusion strategy not only yields higher classification accuracy but also provides interpretability. Specifically, by analyzing the learned fuzzy measures, insights are revealed about class-specific shifts in the network's representation reliance. By dynamically shifting attention to the representation least corrupted by potential asymmetric channel distortions, the proposed gating mechanism mitigates the non-stationary challenges of the underwater environment. Evaluations on the DeepShip and ShipsEar datasets demonstrate that the proposed architecture achieves classification improvements over independent single-encoder baselines, while simultaneously restricting the trainable parameter space. This mitigates the risk of overfitting on limited acoustic datasets while alleviating the computational costs associated with fully fine-tuning foundation models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

18 of 48 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
  4. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  5. 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,722
  6. 2023ConvNeXt V2: Co-designing and Scaling ConvNets with Masked Autoencoderscited by 712
  7. 2016CNN Architectures for Large-Scale Audio Classificationcited by 704
  8. 2020VGGSound: A Large-scale Audio-Visual Datasetcited by 648
  9. 2021AST: Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 643
  10. 2019PANNs: Large-Scale Pretrained Audio Neural Networks for Audio Pattern Recognitioncited by 574
  11. 2020FSD50K: An Open Dataset of Human-Labeled Sound Eventscited by 342
  12. 2021SSAST: Self-Supervised Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 169
6 more
  1. 2019Deep Learning for Audio Signal Processingcited by 92
  2. 2022AVES: Animal Vocalization Encoder based on Self-Supervisioncited by 53
  3. 2018Multiple Instance Choquet Integral Classifier Fusion and Regression for Remote Sensing Applicationscited by 3
  4. 2024Adversarial multi-task underwater acoustic target recognition: towards robustness against various influential factorscited by 1
  5. 2025Histogram-based Parameter-efficient Tuning for Passive and Active Sonar Classificationcited by 1
  6. 2026SentiFuse: Deep Multi-model Fusion Framework for Robust Sentiment Extractioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.