Consistency Training while Mitigating Obfuscation via Rate Matching
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are often influenced by extraneous input features, such as cues revealing a user's preferred answer. Consistency training reduces this influence by training models to behave similarly across inputs with and without the extraneous feature. However, existing methods train for consistency over entire responses or internal activations, which also constrains whether the model verbalises said extraneous features. We show this leads to obfuscation, where the model learns not to mention a cue while remaining influenced by it, which may undermine monitorability. To address this, we introduce Rate Matching Consistency Training (RMCT), which trains for consistency over selected behavioural properties without constraining how this behaviour is expressed. RMCT matches the rate at which the model exhibits a target behaviour (e.g., following a bias cue) across input perturbations, rather than requiring paired inputs with and without the extraneous feature, extending consistency training to settings where the extraneous features cannot be removed. We evaluate RMCT on sycophancy reduction in two open-weight language models, achieving reductions in bias-following comparable to a standard consistency-training baseline on held-out bias types, while largely preserving the model's tendency to verbalise the bias cue. Further, we find that RMCT is more data-efficient at the expense of being less compute-efficient in our experiments. Overall, RMCT shows that consistency training can improve behavioural robustness without directly trading off against monitorability.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.
Builds on
16 of 25 references.
References · 16
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,386
- 2022Discovering Language Model Behaviors with Model-Written Evaluationscited by 836
- 2025Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscationcited by 384
- 2025Chain of Thought Monitorability: A New and Fragile Opportunity for AI Safetycited by 249
- 2024Analyzing the Generalization and Reliability of Steering Vectorscited by 143
- 2025Large Language Models Often Know When They Are Being Evaluatedcited by 128
- 2025Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Trainingcited by 86
- 2024Designing a Dashboard for Transparency and Control of Conversational AIcited by 46
- 2024Bias-Augmented Consistency Training Reduces Biased Reasoning in Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 39
4 more
- 2025Probing and Steering Evaluation Awareness of Language Modelscited by 35
- 2025Steering Evaluation-Aware Language Models to Act Like They Are Deployedcited by 35
- 2025Consistency Training Helps Stop Sycophancy and Jailbreakscited by 16
- 2025Output Supervision Can Obfuscate the Chain of Thoughtcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Consistency Training Can Entrench Misalignmentcited by 2
- 2026Consistency Training Along the Transformer Stackcited by 1
- 2026Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistencycited by 1
- 2026Unlearning Deceptive Behaviors in LLMs with Contrastive Forget Setscited by 0
- 2026Unlearning Deceptive Behaviors in LLMs with Contrastive Forget Sets30 Sep 2026
- 2026Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistency31 Jul 2026
- 2026Consistency Training Along the Transformer Stack4 Jun 2026
- 2026Consistency Training Can Entrench Misalignment2 Jun 2026