mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Second-order consistency for learning chaotic dynamics via randomized Jacobian matching

arXiv 2606.01596 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2026math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Short-horizon accuracy does not ensure that a learned chaotic system has correct long-time dynamics. Trajectory (zeroth-order) matching constrains vector-field values, and Jacobian (first-order) matching constrains local tangent dynamics, but neither determines how the Jacobian varies away from supervised states, so a model can be locally accurate while drifting toward spurious attractors and distorting long-time statistics. We show that second-order supervision mitigates these failures. Because forming full Hessian tensors is computationally prohibitive in high dimensions, we propose model-constrained randomized Jacobian matching, which compares the Jacobians of the true and learned vector fields at randomly perturbed inputs. A Taylor expansion shows that the expected randomized Jacobian loss decomposes into the Jacobian mismatch plus a Hessian mismatch scaled by the noise variance, implicitly enforcing second-order consistency at O(d2) memory cost without forming the O(d3) Hessian tensor. In Lorenz 63 with minimal temporal supervision, second-order supervision reduces invariant-measure error and Lyapunov-spectrum MSE, and recovers the constant Hessian norm of the true bilinear field. Across five training seeds, explicit Hessian matching produces catastrophic Lyapunov outliers for four of five seeds, whereas randomized Jacobian matching produces none among 5,000 on-attractor rollouts, and it attains the largest threshold in a directional capture scan. In coupled Lorenz 96, first-order methods enter spurious high-amplitude regimes as forcing increases, while second-order methods retain accurate marginals. Randomized Jacobian matching costs about the same as explicit Hessian matching on Lorenz 63 and 40% less on Lorenz 96, with no reference Hessian evaluations during training.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.

Builds on

8 of 21 references.

References · 8

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  2. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
  3. 2020Universal Differential Equations for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 345
  4. 2018Knowledge Transfer with Jacobian Matchingcited by 73
  5. 2024When are dynamical systems learned from time series data statistically accurate?cited by 14
  6. 2022Gradient-Enhanced Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Power Systems Operational Supportcited by 6
  7. 2022A Model-Constrained Tangent Slope Learning Approach for Dynamical Systemscited by 3
  8. 2024Jacobian-Enforced Neural Networks (JENN) for Improved Data Assimilation Consistency in Dynamical Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.