Fast Generalization after Interpolation via Critically Damped Momentum Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A central problem in machine learning is that models can achieve near-perfect training performance while generalizing substantially less well to unseen examples. This gap is especially acute in high-dimensional, low-sample regimes, where many interpolating solutions exist and optimization must implicitly select among minima with different generalization properties. Following recent theoretical advances on optimization dynamics near the interpolation threshold, we note that the two-regime structure of risk minimization, with loss minimization followed by complexity minimization, motivates a biphasic optimization schedule. We thus theoretically demonstrate that GROKtimizer, a biphasic strategy that combines rapid convergence to interpolation with Critically Damped Momentum (CDM)-based post-interpolation norm minimization, offers a natural solution for selecting low-norm interpolating solutions. Under a local quadratic model of the post-interpolation basin, GROKtimizer provides a quadratic speedup over classical gradient descent, with provable optimality among first-order optimizers. To showcase the applicability of our method, we evaluate GROKtimizer on several synthetic benchmarks common in the classical grokking literature and on various real-world datasets. Finally, we reconcile our findings with the flat-minima hypothesis, highlighting the importance of post-interpolation dynamics in the construction of high-quality, generalizing models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2026.
Builds on
27 of 51 references.
References · 27
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2018A Convergence Theory for Deep Learning via Over-Parameterizationcited by 787
- 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 738
- 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 655
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 588
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 549
- 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 466
15 more
- 2018Essentially No Barriers in Neural Network Energy Landscapecited by 330
- 2018Scalable and accurate deep learning for electronic health recordscited by 280
- 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
- 2022Towards Understanding Grokking: An Effective Theory of Representation Learningcited by 230
- 2023Grokking as the Transition from Lazy to Rich Training Dynamicscited by 108
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 90
- 2022When Do Flat Minima Optimizers Work?cited by 78
- 2021Loss Surface Simplexes for Mode Connecting Volumes and Fast Ensemblingcited by 75
- 2025A Theoretical Framework for Grokking: Interpolation followed by Riemannian Norm Minimisationcited by 13
- 2025Grokking in the Wild: Data Augmentation for Real-World Multi-Hop Reasoning with Transformerscited by 12
- 2025SETOL: A Semi-Empirical Theory of (Deep) Learningcited by 12
- 2025The Geometry of Grokking: Norm Minimization on the Zero-Loss Manifoldcited by 9
- 2025Grokking and Generalization Collapse: Insights from textttHTSR theorycited by 8
- 2024Acceleration of Grokking in Learning Arithmetic Operations via Kolmogorov-Arnold Representationcited by 3
- 2025Not All Explanations for Deep Learning Phenomena Are Equally Valuablecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.