Neural Network Compression by Approximate Differential Equivalence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural network compression is commonly achieved by pruning parameters based on local importance scores, e.g., magnitude-based pruning. We propose a complementary approach that compresses models by aggregating neurons with similar functional behavior rather than removing weights independently. Our method encodes a trained network as a polynomial ODE system and applies a lumping method called Approximate Forward Differential Equivalence to identify neurons with approximately matching induced dynamics. A single tolerance parameter, varepsilon, controls the compression level and induces a smooth trade-off between model size and predictive accuracy. We evaluate the method on synthetic datasets derived from nonlinear dynamical systems with known ground-truth behavior and on public regression benchmarks. Across both settings, the proposed approach achieves substantial parameter reduction while preserving accuracy, and consistently compares favorably with magnitude-based pruning and Wanda at similar compression levels. These results suggest that differential equivalence-based aggregation is a principled and effective alternative to conventional weight-centric pruning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.
Builds on
29 of 43 references.
References · 29
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,291
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,090
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 776
- 2017Channel Pruning for Accelerating Very Deep Neural Networkscited by 697
- 2023VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Modelscited by 686
17 more
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 643
- 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
- 2024Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Modelscited by 467
- 2017ThiNet: A Filter Level Pruning Method for Deep Neural Network Compressioncited by 438
- 2020Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuningcited by 398
- 2018Filter Pruning via Geometric Median for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Accelerationcited by 365
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 200
- 2021Group Fisher Pruning for Practical Network Compressioncited by 130
- 2020Layer-adaptive sparsity for the Magnitude-based Pruningcited by 122
- 2019Gate Decorator: Global Filter Pruning Method for Accelerating Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2020Neural Pruning via Growing Regularizationcited by 97
- 2018Multistep Neural Networks for Data-driven Discovery of Nonlinear Dynamical Systemscited by 88
- 2020Logarithmic Pruning is All You Needcited by 71
- 2017More is Less: A More Complicated Network with Less Inference Complexitycited by 66
- 2020Pruning Filter in Filtercited by 46
- 2020An Image Enhancing Pattern-based Sparsity for Real-time Inference on Mobile Devicescited by 18
- 2022Neural Networks Reduction via Lumpingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.