Don't Read Everything: A Curvature-Conditioned Query for Linear Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Linear attention reduces the quadratic cost of softmax attention by maintaining a recurrent fast-weight state, but it consistently lags on in-context retrieval and long-context tasks. Existing remedies act on the write side of memory through gating, delta updates, or kernel feature maps, but the read step is left unchanged: every past key contributes additively to the output, so useful targets are diluted by the bulk of stored vectors. We borrow one specific piece of softmax's geometry to construct a cheap read-time contraction of the query. A second-order Taylor expansion of the softmax log-partition at the isotropic-attention point gives a local quadratic model whose curvature coincides with the running key covariance, a quantity that can be maintained with the same recurrent/chunkwise mechanism as the linear-attention state. The associated linear operator contracts the query along the high-variance directions of memory before it reads the state. We call this mechanism Curvature-Conditioned Query (CCQ). CCQ modifies only the read step and is composable with any linear-attention backbone. Attached to GLA and Gated DeltaNet, it improves perplexity, zero-shot downstream accuracy, S-NIAH retrieval at and beyond the training context, length-extrapolation perplexity from 4K to 20K, and LongBench accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.
Builds on
21 of 32 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
- 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
- 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,417
- 2024RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?cited by 1,346
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,336
- 2024The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scalecited by 1,160
- 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 532
- 2023Gated Linear Attention Transformers with Hardware-Efficient Trainingcited by 514
- 2021Linear Transformers Are Secretly Fast Weight Programmerscited by 502
- 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
9 more
- 2024Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden Statescited by 355
- 2021Random Feature Attentioncited by 354
- 2024Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Timecited by 328
- 2024Simple linear attention language models balance the recall-throughput tradeoffcited by 208
- 2023Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Modelscited by 204
- 2024The Hedgehog & the Porcupine: Expressive Linear Attentions with Softmax Mimicrycited by 120
- 2021Finetuning Pretrained Transformers into RNNscited by 96
- 2025On the Expressiveness of Softmax Attention: A Recurrent Neural Network Perspectivecited by 6
- 20262Mamba2Furious: Linear in Complexity, Competitive in Accuracycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.