Digging Up Citations: FOSSIL, a Dataset and Workflow for Reference Extraction in Law and the Humanities
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Citation extraction tools are designed for the structured end-of-document bibliographies of the natural sciences, but law and humanities scholarship cites references primarily in footnotes, where bibliographic data is interleaved with commentary and cross-references and varies widely across languages and styles. To address the scarcity of suitable gold-standard resources, we present FOSSIL (Footnote-based Open-access SSH Scientific Instance Labels), an openly licensed multilingual dataset of 96 annotated scholarly articles containing over 7,600 footnote-embedded references, together with PDF-TEI Editor (a collaborative web annotation tool), a documented seven-annotator workflow, and a Grobid specialization for footnote-based citations. In end-to-end evaluation, the specialized pipeline nearly doubles extraction quality over default Grobid (micro-F1 from 0.36 to 0.72), driven largely by improved recall, while showing that substantial headroom remains for cross-references and mixed-content footnotes. This extended abstract presents work in progress; annotations of citations segmentation and parsing, and cross-reference resolution are ongoing.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.
Builds on
4 of 14 references.
References · 4
- 2025Comprehensive Analysis of Transparency and Accessibility of ChatGPT, DeepSeek, And other SoTA Large Language Modelscited by 8
- 2025Citation Parsing and Analysis with Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Large Language Models for History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science: Interpretive Uses, Methodological Challenges, and Critical Perspectivescited by 2
- 2022Structured references from PDF articles: assessing the tools for bibliographic reference extraction and parsingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.