Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Language Models Via Decoder Layer Skipping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved strong performance across diverse natural language tasks, yet their outputs often suffer from hallucinations -- content that is misaligned with factual information. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive layer-wise analysis of the decoding process and reveal that hallucinations tend to originate from deeper decoder layers. To address this issue, we introduce DeLask (Decoder Layer Skipping), a novel decoding framework that dynamically skips layers prone to producing hallucinations. DeLask leverages the theoretical insight that the forward computation of an L-layer Transformer is conditionally equivalent to L steps of gradient descent. We define a driftance value by computing the cosine similarity between gradients derived from consecutive decoder steps, identifying problematic layers when the descent direction reverses. Rather than discarding such layers entirely, DeLask partially aggregates their hidden states with preceding layers, thereby preserving consistency while suppressing erroneous signals. Extensive experiments across diverse LLMs and benchmarks demonstrate that DeLask consistently mitigates hallucinations and enhances overall reliability, providing a lightweight and generalizable decoding framework for improving the robustness of large-scale language models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
20 of 22 references.
References · 20
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,710
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
- 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 674
- 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 626
- 2023RLHF-V: Towards Trustworthy MLLMs via Behavior Alignment from Fine-grained Correctional Human Feedbackcited by 404
8 more
- 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 367
- 2023Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learningcited by 274
- 2023Sources of Hallucination by Large Language Models on Inference Taskscited by 168
- 2023Generating Benchmarks for Factuality Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 103
- 2024In-Context Sharpness as Alerts: An Inner Representation Perspective for Hallucination Mitigationcited by 43
- 2025Accelerating LLM Inference with Lossless Speculative Decoding Algorithms for Heterogeneous Vocabulariescited by 20
- 2024SLED: Self Logits Evolution Decoding for Improving Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 16
- 2025The Efficiency vs. Accuracy Trade-off: Optimizing RAG-Enhanced LLM Recommender Systems Using Multi-Head Early Exitcited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.