ViBE: Co-Optimizing Workload Skew and Hardware Variability for MoE Serving
On the map: Mixture-of-experts → Efficient MoE training and inference systems
Abstract (arXiv)
In distributed Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) inference, input-dependent token routing interacts with GPU performance variability to create persistent stragglers under synchronized execution, where the slowest GPU determines layer latency. This performance variability is inherent to modern accelerators: manufacturing variation, power limits, and thermal conditions introduce measurable execution-time differences across nominally identical GPUs. The core challenge is that MoE execution-time imbalance arises from the interaction of workload skew and hardware asymmetry. Token routing produces uneven and layer-varying expert loads, while GPU throughput depends on device-specific operating characteristics and workload intensity. Prior work mitigates routing skew but assumes homogeneous hardware, optimizing token balance rather than execution latency. As a result, even balanced token assignments can leave hardware-induced stragglers unaddressed. Thus, we propose Variability-Informed Binning of Experts (ViBE), a hardware-aware expert placement framework that minimizes execution-time imbalance across GPUs. ViBE combines per-GPU performance modeling with expert activation profiling to assign high-load experts to faster devices and low-load experts to slower ones, reducing layer-level stragglers without modifying model semantics or hardware. Because both workload characteristics and effective GPU throughput can shift across serving conditions, ViBE supports lightweight recalibration under workload/performance drift to refresh its routing and performance estimates when needed. Results show that ViBE consistently reduces execution-time imbalance and improves SLO attainment by 14%, while lowering P90 TTFT by up to 45%. We further show that the impact of hardware variability increases at scale, making variability-aware placement important for efficient, high-utilization LLM serving.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Efficient MoE training and inference systems, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
Closest ancestors · 6
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Comet: Fine-grained Computation-communication Overlapping for Mixture-of-Experts27 Feb
- 2025MoETuner: Optimized Mixture of Expert Serving with Balanced Expert Placement and Token Routing10 Feb
- 2024Exploiting Inter-Layer Expert Affinity for Accelerating Mixture-of-Experts Model Inference16 Jan
- 2022Accelerating Distributed MoE Training and Inference with Lina31 Oct
- 2022DeepSpeed-MoE: Advancing Mixture-of-Experts Inference and Training to Power Next-Generation AI Scale14 Jan
- 2021FastMoE: A Fast Mixture-of-Expert Training System24 Mar
Other references · 18
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2019Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelismcited by 1,829
- 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,601
- 2025gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Cardcited by 1,258
- 2024DistServe: Disaggregating Prefill and Decoding for Goodput-optimized Large Language Model Servingcited by 595
- 2023Splitwise: Efficient generative LLM inference using phase splittingcited by 536
- 2024Taming Throughput-Latency Tradeoff in LLM Inference with Sarathi-Servecited by 507
- 2025TAPAS: Thermal- and Power-Aware Scheduling for LLM Inference in Cloud Platformscited by 28
6 more
- 2023Reducing Energy Bloat in Large Model Trainingcited by 22
- 2024SLO-aware GPU Frequency Scaling for Energy Efficient LLM Inference Servingcited by 18
- 2022Not All GPUs Are Created Equal: Characterizing Variability in Large-Scale, Accelerator-Rich Systemscited by 9
- 2025Characterizing the Efficiency of Distributed Training: A Power, Performance, and Thermal Perspectivecited by 5
- 2024Integrated Hardware Architecture and Device Placement Searchcited by 4
- 2025Lit Silicon: A Case Where Thermal Imbalance Couples Concurrent Execution in Multiple GPUscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Efficient MoE Serving in the Memory-Bound Regime: Balance Activated Experts, Not Tokens
- 2026GEM: GPU-Variability-Aware Expert to GPU Mapping for MoE Systems
- 2026DALI: A Workload-Aware Offloading Framework for Efficient MoE Inference on Local PCs
- 2025MoE-GPS: Guidlines for Prediction Strategy for Dynamic Expert Duplication in MoE Load Balancing
- 2026WiSP: A Working-Set View of Mixture-of-Experts Serving on Extremely Low-Resource Hardware
- 2026TopoEP: Topology-Aware Load Balancing for Expert-Parallel MoE Training
- 2026A Scheduling Framework for Efficient MoE Inference on Edge GPU-NDP Systems
- 2025HarMoEny: Efficient Multi-GPU Inference of MoE Models