Taming the Loss Landscape of PINNs with Noisy Feynman-Kac Supervision: Operator Preconditioning and Non-Asymptotic Error Bounds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) often train slowly or fail to converge on challenging partial differential equations (PDEs), a behavior recently linked to severely ill-conditioned loss landscapes inherited from the underlying differential operator. We study PINNs augmented with a pointwise data-fidelity term, added at a few points in the domain to the standard residual and boundary losses. We show that this supervision term acts as an operator-level preconditioner: for suitable weights, our comparison bounds guarantee a substantially smaller condition number than under the standard PINN loss, independently of how the pointwise labels are obtained. For a broad class of PDEs admitting a Feynman-Kac (FK) representation, we generate such labels by Monte Carlo averages of the FK functional, resulting in what we call ``FK-PINNs", and using the excess risk decomposition approach, we derive non-asymptotic L2(Omega)-error bounds for FK-PINNs with tanh activation trained by finitely many steps of gradient descent. Along the way, we establish pseudo-dimension bounds for first- and second-order derivatives of tanh neural networks, which are of independent interest and, to the best of our knowledge, new. Numerical experiments on Poisson, Schr"odinger, mean exit time, and committor problems corroborate the theory, and show that FK-PINNs can successfully solve PDEs for which standard PINNs exhibit severe failure modes.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
3 of 72 references.
References · 3
- 2024Quantifying Training Difficulty and Accelerating Convergence in Neural Network-Based PDE Solverscited by 4
- 2024Interpolation with deep neural networks with non-polynomial activations: necessary and sufficient numbers of neuronscited by 2
- 2026Operator Learning Using Weak Supervision from Walk-on-Spherescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.