mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Attribute-Based Measure of Video Complexity

arXiv 2606.00640 ↗First posted 30 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A new framework for the estimation of the complexity posed by video-question pairs to video-LLMs, Video Attribute-Based Complexity (VideoABC), is proposed. Video complexity is defined as the probability of failure of a video-LLM for a given video-question pair. VideoABC is a non-parametric complexity measure, using a reference video dataset and a pre-defined vocabulary of video attributes informative of complexity, eg the scene complexity or the speed of the video event informative of the question. In a training phase, reference videos are projected into the space of these attributes, which is then quantized. The expected ABC of each quantization cell is then computed. Given a new video and its projection into the attribute space, complexity is estimated by the expected ABC of the associated quantization cell. To enable the use of VideoABC with small reference video datasets, two quantizers are combined: a k-means quantizer that enables accurate complexity estimates for samples in the distribution of the reference dataset and a universal lattice quantizer that guarantees generalization to out-of-distribution samples. A synthetic video generation procedure, inspired by target-distractor manipulations of psychophysics studies, is proposed to populate the cells of the lattice quantizer during training, enabling the computation of their expected ABCs. Experimental results show that VideoABCis effective even with very low-dimensional attribute representations, substantially outperforming approaches like `video-LLM as judge' with much less complexity. Finally, the explainable nature of the VideoABC score, in terms of well-defined attributes, is shown to provide insights on how the attribute composition of benchmarks affects their complexity.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 67 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
  3. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,669
  4. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  5. 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,769
  6. 2023Video-LLaVA: Learning United Visual Representation by Alignment Before Projectioncited by 1,385
  7. 2024Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysiscited by 1,375
  8. 2023MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,086
  9. 2021NExT-QA:Next Phase of Question-Answering to Explaining Temporal Actionscited by 735
  10. 2023EgoSchema: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Very Long-form Video Language Understandingcited by 666
  11. 2024LongVideoBench: A Benchmark for Long-context Interleaved Video-Language Understandingcited by 644
  12. 2025VideoLLaMA 3: Frontier Multimodal Foundation Models for Image and Video Understandingcited by 502
13 more
  1. 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 479
  2. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  3. 2024TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?cited by 352
  4. 2024What matters when building vision-language models?cited by 321
  5. 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 201
  6. 2025Qwen2.5-1M Technical Reportcited by 158
  7. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  8. 2023VideoLLM: Modeling Video Sequence with Large Language Modelscited by 116
  9. 2024CinePile: A Long Video Question Answering Dataset and Benchmarkcited by 112
  10. 2024Apollo: An Exploration of Video Understanding in Large Multimodal Modelscited by 87
  11. 2024Answer, Assemble, Ace: Understanding How LMs Answer Multiple Choice Questionscited by 35
  12. 2025Breaking Down Video LLM Benchmarks: Knowledge, Spatial Perception, or True Temporal Understanding?cited by 19
  13. 2025Understanding Complexity in VideoQA via Visual Program Generationcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.