Rethinking Amortized Neural Representations for High-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Implicit neural representations (INRs) model a signal as a continuous coordinate-to-value function. For terrain elevation data, this supports analytic derivatives, arbitrary-resolution decoding, and a smooth surface model of the underlying heightfield. However, fitting and storing a separate INR for every tile does not scale to large terrain datasets. Amortized neural representations reduce this cost with a shared network: a new tile is mapped to a compact per-tile payload, and a shared decoder reconstructs the heightfield from it. Most such methods are hypernetworks that predict the payload in a single forward pass, while others recover it through a short per-tile optimization. These methods were developed primarily for natural images, and their suitability for terrain heightfields remains unclear. We introduce a controlled benchmark on a 1 m/pixel terrain dataset and evaluate three representative methods under a unified protocol. Observing a clear cross-domain gap, we propose HUVR+SIREN, a hypernetwork that adapts the strongest benchmarked method (HUVR) by replacing its coordinate decoder with a smooth, analytically differentiable one. It attains the best height and derivative fidelity on the benchmark with no additional per-tile storage and lower decode cost, and tolerates aggressive post-training quantization with negligible quality loss, giving a compact terrain neural format. Ablations and diagnostics further identify which design choices transfer to terrain and show that the per-tile bottleneck is already near its useful limit, leaving the remaining gap in the shared hypernetwork's architectural design.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
17 of 33 references.
References · 17
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
- 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
- 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,003
- 2019Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representationscited by 864
- 2020Learned Initializations for Optimizing Coordinate-Based Neural Representationscited by 240
- 2021COIN: COmpression with Implicit Neural representationscited by 232
- 2022From data to functa: Your data point is a function and you can treat it like onecited by 183
- 2021Implicit Neural Representations for Image Compressioncited by 161
- 2022Transformers as Meta-Learners for Implicit Neural Representationscited by 79
5 more
- 2022COOL-CHIC: Coordinate-based Low Complexity Hierarchical Image Codeccited by 50
- 2022Generalizable Implicit Neural Representations via Instance Pattern Composerscited by 38
- 2023INCODE: Implicit Neural Conditioning with Prior Knowledge Embeddingscited by 31
- 2024ImplicitTerrain: a Continuous Surface Model for Terrain Data Analysiscited by 3
- 2026Implicit Neural Representation Facilitates Unified Universal Vision Encodingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.