mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FLaG: Fine-Grained Latent Grouping for Hallucination Detection

arXiv 2606.00301 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) arise from heterogeneous failure mechanisms, making reliable detection difficult for any single global uncertainty score. In this work, we formulate hallucination detection as a mechanism-aware evidence aggregation problem, where diverse representation- and token-level signals must be interpreted under multiple latent explanations. We propose FLaG, a lightweight hallucination detection framework that models correctness through a set of latent evidence groups. Each instance is softly associated with multiple groups via an energy-based routing mechanism, and group-conditional reliability signals are combined through a principled log-marginal aggregation. This design enables FLaG to capture heterogeneous hallucination patterns while remaining invariant to decision thresholds and evaluation metrics. The framework operates as a frozen-model head, requires no modification to the underlying language model, and incurs minimal computational overhead. We further provide a theoretical perspective that connects FLaG to optimal evidence aggregation under heterogeneous error mechanisms, showing that the Bayes-optimal test statistic necessarily admits a log-marginal form and that FLaG constitutes a tractable approximation with a controllable error bound. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks and LLM backbones demonstrate that FLaG consistently achieves SOTA performance, while exhibiting robust transfer across datasets and models, and remaining effective under limited supervision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

21 of 41 references.

References · 21

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  3. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  4. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
  5. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  7. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  8. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,259
  9. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  10. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 733
  11. 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
  12. 2018CoQA: A Conversational Question Answering Challengecited by 674
9 more
  1. 2018Predictive Uncertainty Estimation via Prior Networkscited by 555
  2. 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 246
  3. 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Generation for Conditional Language Modelscited by 193
  4. 2023On Early Detection of Hallucinations in Factual Question Answeringcited by 54
  5. 2024SPUQ: Perturbation-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Large Language Modelscited by 54
  6. 2025Steer LLM Latents for Hallucination Detectioncited by 49
  7. 2024Characterizing Truthfulness in Large Language Model Generations with Local Intrinsic Dimensioncited by 45
  8. 2024On the Universal Truthfulness Hyperplane Inside LLMscited by 23
  9. 2024Detecting Brittle Decisions for Free: Leveraging Margin Consistency in Deep Robust Classifierscited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.