Rare Events, Real Signals: Functional Ensembles as Units of Computation in Deep Spiking Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate how internal representations emerge across hierarchical processing systems by introducing a neuroscience-inspired framework for analyzing deep spiking neural networks (SNN) through the lens of functional connectivity. Drawing on concepts from systems neuroscience and information theory, we form the first-order functionally-connected (1FC) group of a neuron based on its statistically significant pairwise correlations with neurons from the previous layer of a trained SNN architecture. We then track its response properties during inference under various conditions. Our analysis shows that several principles of functional connectivity previously observed in biological cortex are preserved in spiking ResNet architectures. These 1FC ensembles display interesting properties: their aggregate cofiring reliably predicts downstream neuronal responses through a robust, ReLU-like input-output relationship, whose gain scales systematically with ensemble size. Reliable encoding of the presented class emerges only during high 1FC cofiring events, which themselves occur infrequently, indicating that informative representations are concentrated in rare but highly coordinated activity patterns. Under uniform random noise or adversarial perturbations, these response profiles are disrupted, particularly in early and intermediate layers. This enables a targeted high-resolution interrogation at specific nodes and pathways. We showed that the functional connectivity structure is shaped by learning and this structure breaks under weight permutation. These establish 1FC ensembles as a functionally meaningful substrate for input encoding and information transfer, with potential implications in designing targeted fine-grained diagnostics on the information flow.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
21 of 61 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
- 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
- 2020Incorporating Learnable Membrane Time Constant to Enhance Learning of Spiking Neural Networkscited by 345
9 more
- 2021Deep Residual Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 331
- 2018Deep Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 263
- 2020Understanding the Role of Individual Units in a Deep Neural Networkcited by 255
- 2023Localizing Model Behavior with Path Patchingcited by 195
- 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
- 2023Similarity of Neural Network Models: A Survey of Functional and Representational Measurescited by 131
- 2018How Important Is a Neuron?cited by 73
- 2026There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learningcited by 29
- 2021Visual Explanations from Spiking Neural Networks using Interspike Intervalscited by 27
Built on by
Not cited yet.