mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph-Augmented Retrieval for Cross-Entity Financial Sentiment Analysis: A Comparative Study

arXiv 2606.00062 ↗First posted 19 May 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Legal and financial RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become foundational for grounding large language models in domain-specific corpora, yet conventional vector-based RAG systems are fundamentally limited in their ability to capture the structured, multi-entity relationships that underpin financial market analysis. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of a novel two-hop Graph-RAG architecture versus a standard vector-only baseline for cross-entity financial sentiment analysis. Our system constructs a sentiment-weighted knowledge graph of 59 equity entities from 255 news articles covering 10 major technology stocks, then augments dense retrieval with intensity-filtered graph traversal over INFLUENCES edges to surface relational evidence inaccessible to vector search alone. We evaluate both architectures on 100 grounded queries (30 Direct, 70 Relational) using semantic similarity, entity recall, RAGAS metrics, latency benchmarks, and ablation studies. Graph-RAG achieves a statistically significant improvement in entity recall (+6.4%, p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank) and delivers substantially more relevant answers for complex multi-entity queries (+11.7% Answer Relevancy), with gains concentrating in relational question types (+16.1%). Critically, these improvements come at no measurable cost to answer quality (delta = +0.001 semantic similarity, Cohen's d = 0.078), with a modest 22.6% increase in mean latency offset by an 80% reduction in latency variance. An ablation study on the graph traversal intensity threshold reveals an inverted-U relationship with answer quality, identifying tau = 0.5 as optimal over the production default of tau = 0.7. These findings characterize a precision-for-coverage trade-off inherent to graph-augmented retrieval and provide actionable architectural guidance for practitioners building RAG systems for multi-entity financial analysis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Legal and financial RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 3 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2026.

Builds on

3 of 9 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  2. 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
  3. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Rethinking Retrieval: From Traditional Retrieval Augmented Generation to Agentic and Non-Vector Reasoning Systems in the Financial Domain for Large Language Models
  2. 2026Enhancing Financial Report Question-Answering: A Retrieval-Augmented Generation System with Reranking Analysis
  3. 2025Optimizing Retrieval Strategies for Financial Question Answering Documents in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
  4. 2024RAG-IT: Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning for Automated Financial Analysis -- A Case Study for the Semiconductor Sector
  5. 2024Multi-Reranker: Maximizing performance of retrieval-augmented generation in the FinanceRAG challenge
  6. 2026From BM25 to Corrective RAG: Benchmarking Retrieval Strategies for Text-and-Table Documents
  7. 2025VeritasFi: An Adaptable, Multi-tiered RAG Framework for Multi-modal Financial Question Answering
  8. 2025Metadata-Driven Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Financial Question Answering