mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Internalizing Temporal Consistency in Video Object-Centric Learning without Explicit Regularization

arXiv 2605.31508 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Video Object-Centric Learning (OCL) aims to represent objects as textitslot vectors and maintain their consistency across frames. Slot-Slot Contrastive (SSC) loss has become the cornerstone for state-of-the-art (SOTA) video OCL methods. While highly effective, SSC relies on one-to-one object correspondence across frames and introduces an extra loss. Following Occam's Razor, we propose a paradigm shift: temporal consistency is better enforced as an implicit model design rather than an explicit loss. To elegantly exclude SSC (xSSC), we introduce two quasi-zero-overhead synergistic mechanisms: (textiti) Chrono-Channel Decomposition (CCD) structurally disentangles slot representations along the channel dimension into textitstatic and textitdynamic sub-spaces, serving as an empirically unified information bottleneck; (textitii) Cross-Temporal Reconstruction (CTR) stochastically reconstructs target features of either the current or previous time step by fusing current slots' static channels and target slots' dynamic channels, using a single standard OCL decoder with minor training adaptation. Thereby, the slot sets inherently learn temporal consistency by minimizing the standard reconstruction error alone. Extensive experiments show that integrating xSSC into leading baselines not only improves training efficiency but also establishes new SOTAs on video object discovery and recognition tasks. Furthermore, our PCA and gradient analyses confirm that objects' time-invariant semantics and time-variant kinematics are encoded into the proposed sub-spaces. Our source code, model checkpoints and training logs are provided on https://github.com/Genera1Z/xSSC.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

19 of 21 references.

References · 19

  1. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
  4. 2020Object-Centric Learning with Slot Attentioncited by 876
  5. 2022Kubric: A scalable dataset generatorcited by 381
  6. 2021Conditional Object-Centric Learning from Videocited by 248
  7. 2022Bridging the Gap to Real-World Object-Centric Learningcited by 220
  8. 2022SAVi++: Towards End-to-End Object-Centric Learning from Real-World Videoscited by 166
  9. 2022SlotFormer: Unsupervised Visual Dynamics Simulation with Object-Centric Modelscited by 147
  10. 2022Simple Unsupervised Object-Centric Learning for Complex and Naturalistic Videoscited by 139
  11. 2023Object-Centric Learning for Real-World Videos by Predicting Temporal Feature Similaritiescited by 78
  12. 2023Self-supervised Object-Centric Learning for Videoscited by 49
7 more
  1. 2024Temporally Consistent Object-Centric Learning by Contrasting Slotscited by 31
  2. 2023Object-Centric Multiple Object Trackingcited by 15
  3. 2025Slot Attention with Re-Initialization and Self-Distillationcited by 14
  4. 2025Predicting Video Slot Attention Queries from Random Slot-Feature Pairscited by 12
  5. 2025Vector-Quantized Vision Foundation Models for Object-Centric Learningcited by 11
  6. 2025Smoothing Slot Attention Iterations and Recurrencescited by 6
  7. 2024VONet: Unsupervised Video Object Learning With Parallel U-Net Attention and Object-wise Sequential VAEcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.