Cognitive Fatigue in Autoregressive Transformers: Formalization and Measurement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autoregressive language models frequently degrade during long-horizon generation, producing repetitive text, losing instruction adherence, and exhibiting unstable entropy. Despite the prevalence of these failures, practitioners lack online diagnostics to detect them in real-time as they occur. We formalize this degradation as cognitive fatigue, a measurable generation-time state characterized by decay in attention to the original prompt, representational drift, and entropy miscalibration. We introduce the Fatigue Index (FI), a lightweight, model-agnostic diagnostic that aggregates these three signals under explicit axioms (monotonicity, boundedness, interpretability) enabling reliable runtime monitoring. Across nine models (1B-13B parameters), FI trajectories exhibit structured temporal dynamics, predict task degradation (AUROC = 0.95) and repetition (Spearman rho = 0.94), and reveal non-monotonic scaling behavior: instruction-tuned models below 3B exhibit faster collapse than base models, with this trend reversing at 7B. Stress analyses further show that FI onset accelerates under longer contexts, middle-positioned evidence, and reduced numerical precision. These results establish cognitive fatigue as a coherent and measurable phenomenon, and position FI as a principled tool for runtime reliability monitoring in production LLM systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.
Builds on
26 of 36 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,916
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,103
14 more
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
- 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 922
- 2023Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolationcited by 740
- 2023YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Modelscited by 601
- 2019Neural Text Generation with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 503
- 2024InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Modelscited by 135
- 2025Recursive Language Modelscited by 104
- 2015How (not) to Train your Generative Model: Scheduled Sampling, Likelihood, Adversary?cited by 78
- 2024EDT: Improving Large Language Models' Generation by Entropy-based Dynamic Temperature Samplingcited by 45
- 2019Calibration, Entropy Rates, and Memory in Language Modelscited by 32
- 2025Training LLMs for Honesty via Confessionscited by 22
- 2024Dynamic Stochastic Decoding Strategy for Open-Domain Dialogue Generationcited by 10
- 2025Prototype-Based Dynamic Steering for Large Language Modelscited by 6
- 2026Interpreting Transformers Through Attention Head Interventioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.