mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PINNs Failure Modes are Overfitting

arXiv 2605.30910 ↗First posted 29 May 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a common class of machine learning-based partial differential equation (PDE) solvers which train a network to represent a solution by minimizing a residual loss that encodes the PDE. Despite their successes, they are known to fail on certain simple equations, converging to an incorrect solution despite low loss. These failure modes have garnered significant attention in the literature over the past several years, motivating both architectural and optimization based solutions. By directly visualizing the residual, we show that failure modes are the result of overfitting: the loss is minimized on the collocation points, but not elsewhere. Applying regularization causes the failure modes to vanish. Finally, we extend double backpropagation over the full set of residuals, and use it to achieve state-of-the-art performance on four standard failure mode equations with up to 23× fewer collocation points and a vanilla architecture.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2026.

Builds on

25 of 46 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 1,965
  3. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 722
  4. 2017DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equationscited by 674
  5. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  6. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  7. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 581
  8. 2017Solving high-dimensional partial differential equations using deep learningcited by 549
  9. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  10. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 279
  11. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 220
  12. 2017Deep learning-based numerical methods for high-dimensional parabolic partial differential equations and backward stochastic differential equationscited by 188
13 more
  1. 2017Sobolev Training for Neural Networkscited by 136
  2. 2024Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspectivecited by 109
  3. 2022Mitigating Propagation Failures in Physics-informed Neural Networks using Retain-Resample-Release (R3) Samplingcited by 71
  4. 2023PINNsFormer: A Transformer-Based Framework For Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 62
  5. 2024PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selectioncited by 31
  6. 2024Dual Cone Gradient Descent for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 21
  7. 2024Preconditioning for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 12
  8. 2022A Unified Hard-Constraint Framework for Solving Geometrically Complex PDEscited by 11
  9. 2025FP64 is All You Need: Rethinking Failure Modes in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 11
  10. 2025Sub-Sequential Physics-Informed Learning with State Space Modelcited by 10
  11. 2025ProPINN: Demystifying Propagation Failures in Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 6
  12. 2024Solving Differential Equations with Constrained Learningcited by 3
  13. 2025BWLer: Barycentric Weight Layer Elucidates a Precision-Conditioning Tradeoff for PINNscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.